J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richmond, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richmond, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, M. L.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 12, 90-96, Copyright © 1985 by British Orthodontic Society


ARTICLES

A comparison of two- and three-dimensional incisor angles

S Richmond and ML Jones

Two- and three-dimensional incisor angulations are compared in 40 patients using lateral radiographs and direct dental cast measurement using the Reflex Metrograph coupled to a computer. The two-dimensional upper and lower incisor angulations to the occlusal plane were also compared by the two methods. It was found that: The two-dimensional radiographic and three-dimensional dental cast inter-incisor angulation showed a significant difference at a probability level 0.01 greater than p greater than 0.001. The two-dimensional radiographic and two- dimensional dental cast upper left and right incisor angulations to the functional occlusal plane showed a significant difference at a probability level of 0.01 greater than p greater than 0.001. The significant differences can be attributed to the measurement of the incisor crown angulation in the dental cast measurement and the incisor tip and apex assessment in the radiographic technique. The system of dental cast measurement arguably provides a more realistic and reliable assessment of incisal angles than conventional radiographic measurement techniques.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
H Devreese, G De Pauw, G Van Maele, A. Kuijpers-Jagtman, and L Dermaut
Stability of upper incisor inclination changes in Class II division 2 patients
Eur J Orthod, June 1, 2007; 29(3): 314 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 British Orthodontic Society.