J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lovius, B. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tomkins, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lovius, B. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tomkins, A.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 14, 11-20, Copyright © 1987 by British Orthodontic Society

ARTICLES

A clinical trial of a light activated bonding material over an 18 month period

BB Lovius, N Pender, S Hewage, I O'Dowling and A Tomkins

Heliosit-orthodontic, a visible light cured adhesive, has been compared with Right-on, a chemically activated adhesive, on 122 patients for a mean period of 12 months with a range 3-18 months. The overall bond failure rate was 20 per cent. Heliosit-orthodontic had a 23 per cent failure rate compared with a 16 per cent failure rate for Right-on. Heliosit-orthodontic performed less well on the posterior teeth particularly lower second premolars (P less than 0.01). Both materials performed equally well in the labial segment.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur J OrthodHome page
A. Reis, J. E. d. Santos, A. D. Loguercio, and J. R. de Oliveira Bauer
Eighteen-month bracket survival rate: conventional versus self-etch adhesive
Eur J Orthod, February 1, 2008; 30(1): 94 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Orthod.Home page
N. Manning, S. M. Chadwick, D. Plunkett, and T. V. Macfarlane
A randomized clinical trial comparing 'one-step' and 'two-step' orthodontic bonding systems
J. Orthod., December 1, 2006; 33(4): 276 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Orthod.Home page
S. Thiyagarajah, D. J. Spary, and W. P. Rock
A clinical comparison of bracket bond failures in association with direct and indirect bonding.
J. Orthod., September 1, 2006; 33(3): 198 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Orthod.Home page
A. Mavropoulos, A. Karamouzos, G. Kolokithas, and A. E. Athanasiou
In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial
J. Orthod., June 1, 2003; 30(2): 139 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Orthod.Home page
M. Wong and S. Power
A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Pre-coated and Non-pre-coated Brackets
J. Orthod., June 1, 2003; 30(2): 155 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Orthod.Home page
N. A. Mandall, D. T. Millett, C. R. Mattick, J. Hickman, H. V. Worthington, and T. V. Macfarlane
Orthodontic adhesives: a systematic review
J. Orthod., September 1, 2002; 29(3): 205 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Orthod.Home page
M. F. Sfondrini, V. Cacciafesta, and C. Klersy
Halogen versus high-intensity light-curing of uncoated and pre-coated brackets: a shear bond strength study
J. Orthod., March 1, 2002; 29(1): 45 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Orthod.Home page
S. J. Littlewood, L. Mitchell, and D. C. Greenwood
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate Brackets Bonded with a Hydrophilic Primer
J. Orthod., December 1, 2001; 28(4): 301 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 British Orthodontic Society.