J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lavelle, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lavelle, C.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 16, 17-23, Copyright © 1989 by British Orthodontic Society


ARTICLES

A retrospective cephalometric study of Class I patients

C Lavelle
Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

In view of the growing consensus that traditional cephalometric analyses yield data of dubious scientific validity, this study was undertaken using an alternative technique, termed finite element analysis (FEA). The study was based on 14 triangular finite elements spanning seven datum (nodal) points delineating cephalometric form. These points were delineated on lateral cephalographs taken immediately before and following the completion of orthodontic treatment for two samples of boys aged 12-16 years. Although both samples exhibited Class I molar occlusions with anterior over-crowding, one sample required bilateral maxillary and mandibular first premolar extraction prior to orthodontic treatment, while the other sample did not. FEA revealed greater cephalometric size and shape changes in the 'non-extraction' than 'extraction' samples. Such sample contrasts, however, varied depending upon the finite element included in the analysis. Further studies are therefore required to delineate the specific finite element configurations to provide precise descriptions of cephalometric change.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 British Orthodontic Society.