J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Little, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Little, R. M.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 17, 235-241, Copyright © 1990 by British Orthodontic Society


REVIEW ARTICLES

Stability and relapse of dental arch alignment

RM Little
Department of Orthodontics, School of Denistry, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

For more than 35 years, research in the Department of Orthodontics, University of Washington has focused on a growing collection of over 600 sets of patient records to assess stability and failure of orthodontic treatment. All had completed treatment a decade or more prior to the last set of data. Evaluation of treated premolar extraction cases, treated non-extraction cases with generalized spacing, cases treated by arch enlargement strategies, and untreated normal occlusions demonstrate similar physiological changes. 1. Arch length reduces following orthodontic treatment, but also does so in untreated normal occlusions. 2. Arch width measured across the mandibular canine teeth typically reduces post-treatment whether the case was expanded during treatment or not. 3. Mandibular anterior crowding during the post-treatment phase is a continuing phenomenon well into the 20-40 age bracket and likely beyond. 4. Third molar absence or presence, impacted or fully erupted, seems to have little effect on the occurrence or degree of relapse. 5. The degree of post- retention anterior crowding is both unpredictable and variable and no pretreatment variables either from clinical findings, casts, or cephalometric radiographs before or after treatment seem to be useful predictors.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
V. Krusinskiene, P. Kiuttu, J. Julku, A.-S. Silvola, T. Kantomaa, and P. Pirttiniemi
A randomized controlled study of early headgear treatment on occlusal stability--a 13 year follow-up
Eur J Orthod, August 1, 2008; 30(4): 418 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
A. A. Shah, P. J. Sandler, and A. M. Murray
How to ... place a lower bonded retainer
J. Orthod., September 1, 2005; 32(3): 206 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 British Orthodontic Society.