J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacAllister, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rock, W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacAllister, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rock, W. P.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 19, 55-58, Copyright © 1992 by British Orthodontic Society

ARTICLES

The Eastman Standard Incisor Angulations: are they still appropriate?

MJ MacAllister and WP Rock
Department of Orthodontics, Queens University of Belfast, Northern Ireland.

The Eastman Standard values for cephalometry were first described almost 40 years ago and their derivation is not clear. The present study examines the rationale for the Standard and considers the way it was originally described. Based on a sample of 30 cases of Class I occlusions with normally related skeletal bases the mean incisor angulations were found to be exactly on the Eastman Standard, which, therefore, still remains appropriate as a basis for assessment and treatment planning in orthodontics.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Orthod.Home page
A. M. Hamdan and W. P. Rock
Cephalometric Norms in an Arabic Population
J. Orthod., December 1, 2001; 28(4): 297 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 British Orthodontic Society.