J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sims, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sims, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, C. D.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 20, 37-45, Copyright © 1993 by British Orthodontic Society


ARTICLES

Attitudes of orthodontic postgraduates to MSc research projects--a retrospective survey

AP Sims and CD Stephens
Department of Child Dental Health, Bristol Dental School.

A questionnaire survey of 103 past orthodontic postgraduate students from seven U.K. institutions, was undertaken to determine the perceived value of M.Sc. research projects in relation to the amount of effort required by students to complete their reports. Seventy-nine (76.7 per cent) replies were received. The majority of the respondents (47, 59.5 per cent) had trained at the Eastman Dental Hospital, although this did not markedly affect the results statistically other than where the graduates were given a choice of MSc subject (P < 0.001). Most postgraduates (42, 54.6 per cent) had found their projects interesting and useful, but 42 (54.6 per cent) claimed to have spent more than 30 per cent of their working time producing them. Forty-four (55.7 per cent) commented that they had problems with the project; of these, there were complaints of insufficient time (23.5 per cent), material (14.7 per cent), data (13.3 per cent), inadequate supervision or direction (26.5 per cent), and interference with clinical time (16.4 per cent). Twenty (25.3 per cent) had carried out further work on their projects, but only three (2.9 per cent) had gone on to complete a Ph.D.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
J. R. Sandy
Northcroft Memorial Lecture 2006 The future of specialist training
J. Orthod., September 1, 2007; 34(3): 177 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 British Orthodontic Society.