British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 21, 367-373, Copyright © 1994 by British Orthodontic Society

ARTICLES

A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement ex vivo through three types of pre-adjusted brackets when subjected to determined tip or torque values

AP Sims, NE Waters and DJ Birnie
Department of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, Royal Naval Hospital, Haslar, Gosport, Hampshire, U.K.

Friction in fixed appliance systems has received considerable attention in recent literature, although that attributable to varying second order (tip) and third order (torque) adjustments in either the bracket or the archwire has not been fully investigated. The ex vivo study of 0.022 x 0.028-inch slot Minitwin, Activa, and Standard Straight Wire brackets investigates friction when known values of tip or torque were applied to 0.018 x 0.025-inch stainless steel wires. The resistance to sliding of the wire through the ligated brackets was measured on a vertically-mounted Instron testing machine. The results showed that the self-ligating Activa brackets consistently produced less friction than the other conventionally tied brackets. Minitwin brackets were slightly more resistant to movement than the Standard brackets during torquing, but the converse was found when tip was applied. Increasing tip and torque (ranges tested 0-6 degrees and 0-25 degrees, respectively) produced almost linear increases in friction for all brackets, although increasing tip had the more profound effect on friction, particularly in Activa brackets.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Budd, J. Daskalogiannakis, and B. D. Tompson A study of the frictional characteristics of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems Eur J Orthod, December 1, 2008; 30(6): 645 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Reicheneder, T. Gedrange, S. Berrisch, P. Proff, U. Baumert, A. Faltermeier, and D. Muessig Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study Eur J Orthod, December 1, 2008; 30(6): 654 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Hamdan and P. Rock The effect of different combinations of tip and torque on archwire/bracket friction Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2008; 30(5): 508 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Haskova, G. Palmer, and S. P. Jones An ex vivo laboratory study to determine the static frictional resistance of a variable ligation orthodontic bracket system J. Orthod., June 1, 2008; 35(2): 112 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Reicheneder, U Baumert, T Gedrange, P Proff, A Faltermeier, and D Muessig Frictional properties of aesthetic brackets Eur J Orthod, August 1, 2007; 29(4): 359 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Tecco, D. Di Iorio, G. Cordasco, I. Verrocchi, and F. Festa An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance Eur J Orthod, August 1, 2007; 29(4): 390 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. W. T. Harradine Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J. Orthod., September 1, 2003; 30(3): 262 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]