J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sidhu, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sidhu, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sidhu, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sidhu, S. S.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 22, 1-12, Copyright © 1995 by British Orthodontic Society


ARTICLES

Cephalometric analysis of changes produced by a modified Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion

MS Sidhu, OP Kharbanda and SS Sidhu
Department of Dental Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.

This study investigated treatment changes produced by the Herbst appliance in a sample of severe Class II division 1 cases, over a period of 8 months. The sample consisted of 16 girls, of whom eight were treated by the Herbst appliance, whilst eight served as controls. All cases were matched with respect to age, sex, skeletofacial morphology, and length of treatment/observation period. Twenty-two skeletal and 19 dental parameters were recorded on pre- and post- treatment cephalograms. The net treatment effect of Herbst therapy was evaluated, taking into account the growth that occurred in the control sample. The study revealed that during 8 months of Herbst therapy there was a significant increase in mandibular length, along with sagittal repositioning. The skeletal changes in the mandible were mainly responsible for overjet and molar relation correction. A slight, favourable forward rotation of the mandible was identified. Dentoalveolar features included flaring of lower incisors and distalization of upper molars. The appliance did not have any retrusive effect on the maxilla. The modified splint design differed from the original and was cemented rather than bonded.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
J. E. Harrison
Evidence-based Orthodontics--How do I assess the evidence?
J. Orthod., June 1, 2000; 27(2): 189 - 197.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 British Orthodontic Society.