J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Battagel, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Battagel, J. M.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 22, 135-144, Copyright © 1995 by British Orthodontic Society


ARTICLES

Chernoff faces: an orthodontic application

JM Battagel
Department of Child Dental Health, London Hospital Medical College Dental School, UK.

This retrospective study examined 21 children (12 males and nine females) with Class III malocclusions, who had been successfully treated by a non-extraction technique and for whom follow-up records were available at least 2 years after all treatment and retention had ceased. On the basis of their post-retention records, children were divided into two groups: those who remained stable (n = 10) and those whose treatment relapsed (n = 11). A graphical technique of data description, Chernoff faces, in which variables for each individual may be portrayed by appropriate scaling of selected facial features, was used to construct cartoon faces for each child. Seven variables, overjet, overbite, upper and lower incisor inclination, the numbers of anterior and posterior teeth in lingual occlusion and the angle ANB were chosen and diagrammatic faces drawn using data from both the start of treatment and post-retention stages. These were arranged according to relapse status and scrutinized to determine whether the groups possessed any common features which were related to the outcome of treatment. The faces showed a wide range of variation, especially at the pretreatment stage. Whilst the cartoons were easy to read, no typical features could be identified at the start of treatment which might indicate that therapy would later relapse.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 British Orthodontic Society.