J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barry, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barry, G. R.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 22, 245-248, Copyright © 1995 by British Orthodontic Society


ARTICLES

A clinical investigation of the effects of omission of pumice prophylaxis on band and bond failure

GR Barry
Orthodontic Department, Arrowe Park Hospital, Upton, Wirral, Merseyside, United Kingdom.

One hundred and twelve first molar bands and 614 directly bonded brackets on incisor, canine, and premolar teeth were included in a clinical trail to investigate the importance of omission of pumice prophylaxis at the time of banding and bonding, on their possible subsequent failure. Half of the sample were selected for the non- pumiced test groups using a random number allocation method, the remaining pumiced teeth acting as control groups. Two etch times were used for the direct bonding part of the study, 15 and 60 seconds, with non-pumiced test and pumiced control groups included within both etch- time groups. Results showed no statistical difference in the failure rate of attachments in either test or control groups during the course of treatment. The different etch times had no significant effects in the direct bonding part of the study.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
P. Banks and B. Thiruvenkatachari
Long-term clinical evaluation of bracket failure with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial
J. Orthod., December 1, 2007; 34(4): 243 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
P. Murfitt, A. Quick, M. Swain, and G. Herbison
A randomised clinical trial to investigate bond failure rates using a self-etching primer
Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2006; 28(5): 444 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
K. House, A. J. Ireland, and M. Sherriff
An in-vitro investigation into the use of a single component self-etching primer adhesive system for orthodontic bonding: a pilot study.
J. Orthod., June 1, 2006; 33(2): 116 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
A. J. Ireland and M. Sherriff
The effect of pumicing on the in vivo use of a resin modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement and a conventional no-mix composite for bonding orthodontic brackets
J. Orthod., September 1, 2002; 29(3): 217 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 British Orthodontic Society.