|
|
||||||||
British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 22, 245-248, Copyright © 1995 by British Orthodontic Society
ARTICLES |
GR Barry
Orthodontic Department, Arrowe Park Hospital, Upton, Wirral, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
One hundred and twelve first molar bands and 614 directly bonded brackets on incisor, canine, and premolar teeth were included in a clinical trail to investigate the importance of omission of pumice prophylaxis at the time of banding and bonding, on their possible subsequent failure. Half of the sample were selected for the non- pumiced test groups using a random number allocation method, the remaining pumiced teeth acting as control groups. Two etch times were used for the direct bonding part of the study, 15 and 60 seconds, with non-pumiced test and pumiced control groups included within both etch- time groups. Results showed no statistical difference in the failure rate of attachments in either test or control groups during the course of treatment. The different etch times had no significant effects in the direct bonding part of the study.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Banks and B. Thiruvenkatachari Long-term clinical evaluation of bracket failure with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial J. Orthod., December 1, 2007; 34(4): 243 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Murfitt, A. Quick, M. Swain, and G. Herbison A randomised clinical trial to investigate bond failure rates using a self-etching primer Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2006; 28(5): 444 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. House, A. J. Ireland, and M. Sherriff An in-vitro investigation into the use of a single component self-etching primer adhesive system for orthodontic bonding: a pilot study. J. Orthod., June 1, 2006; 33(2): 116 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Ireland and M. Sherriff The effect of pumicing on the in vivo use of a resin modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement and a conventional no-mix composite for bonding orthodontic brackets J. Orthod., September 1, 2002; 29(3): 217 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |