|
|
||||||||
British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 24, 47-53, Copyright © 1997 by British Orthodontic Society
ARTICLES |
N Erverdi, O Koyuturk and N Kucukkeles
Marmara University School of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
The aim of this study was to compare two intra-oral molar distalization procedures, involving 15 cases with Class II molar relationships. Magnetic devices were applied to the upper right first molars in each case, while nickel-titanium coil springs were used against the upper left first molars, for a period of 3 months. Measurements were made from lateral cephalograms and from photocopies of models taken before and after the distalization procedure. Although upper molar distalization was achieved with ease in both techniques, nickel- titanium coil springs were found to be the more effective in terms of movement achieved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Sayinsu, F. Isik, F. Allaf, and T. Arun Unilateral molar distalization with a modified slider Eur J Orthod, August 1, 2006; 28(4): 361 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Harrison Evidence-based Orthodontics--How do I assess the evidence? J. Orthod., June 1, 2000; 27(2): 189 - 197. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |