J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fox, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, C. P.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 24, 217-221, Copyright © 1997 by British Orthodontic Society


ARTICLES

Factors affecting the outcome of orthodontic treatment within the general dental service

NA Fox, S Richmond, JL Wright and CP Daniels
Orthodontic Department, Middlesbrough General Hospital, Cleveland, U.K.

Previous studies have suggested large differences in the outcome of orthodontic treatment as measured by the PAR index in two adjacent regions of England. The aim of this prospective study was to identify any factors contributing to the mean PAR score reduction in the North Western region and the Mersey region. Forty-one practitioners submitted 375 sets of start models and 250 end of treatment models. The study ran for 36 months. There were no significant differences detected in the type of malocclusion treated or in outcome of treatment between the two regions with respect to the PAR and IOTN indices. This study did, however, clearly demonstrate that qualified orthodontic practitioners were achieving significantly better results with fixed appliances that practitioners with no orthodontic qualification who used fixed appliances.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
H. Kerosuo, M. Vakiparta, M. Nystrom, and K. Heikinheimo
The Seven-year Outcome of an Early Orthodontic Treatment Strategy
J. Dent. Res., June 1, 2008; 87(6): 584 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
A. J. Bernas, D. W. Banting, and L. L. Short
Effectiveness of Phase I Orthodontic Treatment in an Undergraduate Teaching Clinic
J Dent Educ., September 1, 2007; 71(9): 1179 - 1186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
S. Richmond
Guest Editorial: The Need for Cost-effectiveness
J. Orthod., September 1, 2000; 27(3): 267 - 269.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
L. H. Teh, W. J. S. Kerr, and J. H. McColl
Orthodontic Treatment with Fixed Appliances in the General Dental Service in Scotland
J. Orthod., June 1, 2000; 27(2): 175 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
J. E. Harrison
Evidence-based Orthodontics--How do I assess the evidence?
J. Orthod., June 1, 2000; 27(2): 189 - 197.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 British Orthodontic Society.