British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 24, 309-317, Copyright © 1997 by British Orthodontic Society

ARTICLES

A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems

GE Read-Ward, SP Jones and EH Davies
Department of Orthodontics, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, U.K.

This ex-vivo study compared the static frictional resistance of three self-ligating brackets with a conventional steel-ligated Ultratrimm bracket. The effects of archwire size (0.020, 0.019 x 0.025 and 0.021 x 0.025-inch), bracket/archwire angulation (0, 5 and 10 degrees) and the presence of unstimulated human saliva were investigated. The study demonstrated that both increases in wire size and bracket/archwire angulation resulted in increased static frictional resistance for all bracket types tested, with the presence of saliva having an inconsistent effect. Mobil-Lock Variable-Slot had the least friction for all wires for 0 degree angulation. However, with the introduction of angulation, the values were comparable to those of the other brackets. Activa brackets had the second lowest frictional resistance, although high values were found with 0.019 x 0.025-inch wires. SPEED brackets demonstrated low forces with round wires, although with rectangular wires or in the presence of angulation, friction was greatly increased. Ultratrimm brackets produced large individual variation, confirming the difficulty in standardizing ligation force, although under certain conditions, significantly larger frictional forces were observed. In conclusion, self-ligating brackets showed reduced frictional resistance in comparison to steel ligated brackets only under certain conditions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Shen, R.-J. Chen, Z. Hu, and Y.-F. Qian The effects of a newly designed twin-slot bracket on severely malpositioned teeth--a typodont experimental study Eur J Orthod, August 1, 2008; 30(4): 401 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Hamdan and P. Rock The effect of different combinations of tip and torque on archwire/bracket friction Eur J Orthod, July 24, 2008; (2008) cjn017v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Haskova, G. Palmer, and S. P. Jones An ex vivo laboratory study to determine the static frictional resistance of a variable ligation orthodontic bracket system J. Orthod., June 1, 2008; 35(2): 112 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Scott, M. Sherriff, A. T. DiBiase, and M. T. Cobourne Perception of discomfort during initial orthodontic tooth alignment using a self-ligating or conventional bracket system: a randomized clinical trial Eur J Orthod, June 1, 2008; 30(3): 227 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Reicheneder, U Baumert, T Gedrange, P Proff, A Faltermeier, and D Muessig Frictional properties of aesthetic brackets Eur J Orthod, August 1, 2007; 29(4): 359 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Tecco, D. Di Iorio, G. Cordasco, I. Verrocchi, and F. Festa An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance Eur J Orthod, August 1, 2007; 29(4): 390 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. W. T. Harradine Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J. Orthod., September 1, 2003; 30(3): 262 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]