J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larmour, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larmour, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, P. H.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 25, 35-39, Copyright © 1998 by British Orthodontic Society


ARTICLES

An ex vivo investigation into the effects of chemical solvents on the debond behaviour of ceramic orthodontic brackets

CJ Larmour, JF McCabe and PH Gordon
Orthodontic Department, Middlesbrough General Hospital, U.K.

The problems of ceramic bracket debond have been well documented. A peppermint oil material has been marketed previously as a debonding agent. This study assessed ex vivo the effects of peppermint oil application on the debond behaviour of ceramic brackets compared with ethanol and acetone which are recognized softening agents. Intrigue brackets were bonded to 100 extracted premolar teeth. Groups of 20 bonded teeth were then placed in a test solution, control (distilled water), peppermint oil (5 minutes and 1 hour), acetone (1 hour), and ethanol (1 hour). The teeth were debonded using an Instron. Universal Testing Machine and debond forces recorded. The site of bond failure along with the adhesive remnant index was recorded for each tooth. One hour placement in peppermint oil produced the lowest mean and maximal debond forces (77 and 114 N, respectively). Weibull analysis showed that the probability of failure at 100 N was increased for the 1-hour peppermint group at 88 per cent compared with 52 per cent for the control. Placement in peppermint oil produced the lowest levels of retained resin. There was no evidence of enamel fracture with any of the groups, but bracket fracture remained a problem.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
J. S. Russell
Current Products and Practice: Aesthetic Orthodontic Brackets
J. Orthod., June 1, 2005; 32(2): 146 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
R. A. Linklater and P. H. Gordon
An Ex Vivo Study to Investigate Bond Strengths of Different Tooth Types
J. Orthod., March 1, 2001; 28(1): 59 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 British Orthodontic Society.