J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harradine, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by Toth, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harradine, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by Toth, B.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 25, 117-122, Copyright © 1998 by British Orthodontic Society

ARTICLES

The effect of extraction of third molars on late lower incisor crowding: a randomized controlled trial

NW Harradine, MH Pearson and B Toth
Division of Child Dental Health, University of Bristol Dental School, U.K.

The problem of late mandibular incisor crowding is a well established phenomenon, the cause of which has been the substance of considerable debate over the years. A central issue is the possible role of the third molars though no definitive conclusions have been consistently drawn. This prospective study was designed to investigate the effects of randomly assigned early extraction of third molars on late crowding of the mandibular incisors. One-hundred-and-sixty-four patients entered the study from 1984 following completion of retention after orthodontic treatment. Seventy-seven patients (47%) returned for records up to a mean of 66 months later, and their start and finish study casts were digitized on a reflex microscope to determine Little's index of irregularity, intercanine width and arch length. Forty-four of the patients had been randomized to have third molars removed. There was no evidence of responder bias. Where third molars were extracted the mean increase in lower labial segment irregularity was reduced by 1.1 mm from a mean of 2.1 mm for the group where third molars were retained (P = 0.15, not statistically significant). This difference was also not considered to be clinically significant. The principal conclusion drawn from this randomized prospective study is that the removal of third molars to reduce or prevent late incisor crowding cannot be justified.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Orthod.Home page
J. E. Harrison
Evidence-based Orthodontics--How do I assess the evidence?
J. Orthod., June 1, 2000; 27(2): 189 - 197.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Orthod.Home page
Effectiveness Matters: Prophylactic Removal of Impacted Third Molars: Is It Justified?
J. Orthod., June 1, 1999; 26(2): 149 - 151.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 British Orthodontic Society.