J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heasman, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heasman, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, P. J.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 25, 187-190, Copyright © 1998 by British Orthodontic Society


ARTICLES

Toothbrushing forces in children with fixed orthodontic appliances

PA Heasman, ID MacGregor, Z Wilson and PJ Kelly
Department of Dentistry, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

The aim of this investigation was to determine whether toothbrushing forces are influenced by wearing fixed orthodontic appliances. Thirty children, (10 males, 20 females) with planned fixed appliance therapy and aged 10-15 years, were recruited to the study. No subject had previously worn an orthodontic appliance. At baseline, each subject brushed their teeth in their usual way, unsupervised. The toothbrush used was a purpose-designed electronic instrument that measured the force applied to the brush and transmitted force data by radio to a remote PC. After toothbrushing, subjects had orthodontic brackets fitted. Toothbrushing was repeated at 2 and 14 weeks after baseline, and brushing forces recorded. There were no significant differences between the measurements made at baseline and those made at 2 and 14 weeks. There were no differences between males and females in the forces used at any time point. It was concluded that toothbrushing forces are unaffected by placing fixed orthodontic appliances in children. The brushing forces recorded were comparable with those previously found by other investigators.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
R. G. Newcombe
Statistical Applications in Orthodontics Part III. How Large a Study is Needed?
J. Orthod., June 1, 2001; 28(2): 169 - 172.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
R.G. Newcombe
Statistical Applications in Orthodontics: Part II. Confidence Intervals for Proportions and their Differences
J. Orthod., December 1, 2000; 27(4): 339 - 340.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
R. G. Newcombe
Statistical Applications in Orthodontics. Part I. Confidence Intervals: an Introduction
J. Orthod., September 1, 2000; 27(3): 270 - 272.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 British Orthodontic Society.