J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plunkett, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Herbison, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plunkett, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Herbison, G. P.

British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 25, 203-208, Copyright © 1998 by British Orthodontic Society


ARTICLES

A study of transposed canines in a sample of orthodontic patients

DJ Plunkett, PS Dysart, TB Kardos and GP Herbison
Department of Orthodontics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Tooth transposition is a positional interchange of two adjacent teeth. The most commonly transposed tooth is the permanent canine with either the first premolar or lateral incisor. The records of 54 subjects with transposed canines, both maxillary and mandibular, were collected. Pretreatment study models of these subjects were matched with a similar number of models from unaffected individuals. Bucco-lingual and mesio- distal tooth widths, arch depth and arch width were measured on each model. Thirty-four subjects (63 per cent) were female. Thirty-seven (68.5 per cent) of the cases involved the maxillary arch and thirty- three (89.2 per cent) of these upper arch transpositions were of the canine and first premolar. In cases involving the lower arch the canine was invariably transposed with the lateral incisor. Peg-shaped lateral incisors, supernumerary and/or congenitally absent teeth occurred in 19 subjects. There were some small, but significant differences in the dimensions of some teeth, however there were no statistically significant differences in arch depths, arch widths and most tooth dimensions in subjects with and without transposed canines. These factors do not appear to be related to the development of canine transposition.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
N. J. Ely, M. Sherriff, and M. T. Cobourne
Dental transposition as a disorder of genetic origin
Eur J Orthod, April 1, 2006; 28(2): 145 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
S. Camilleri
Maxillary canine anomalies and tooth agenesis
Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2005; 27(5): 450 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 British Orthodontic Society.