HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Athanasiou, A. E. Articles by Van Der Meij, A. J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Athanasiou, A. E. Articles by Van Der Meij, A. J. W.

Random Errors in Localization of Landmarks in Postero-anterior Cephalograms

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

R.-R. Miethke, D.D.S., M.D., DR.MED.DENT., PH.D.

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Centre of Dental Medicine, Charite University Clinic, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany

A. J. W. Van Der Meij, D.D.S.

Private Orthodontic Practice, The Hague, The Netherlands

A. E. Athanasiou, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece (e-mail: aeathan{at}dent.auth.gr).

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the random error in localization of the most common landmarks in postero-anterior cephalograms (PAC). The study took place at the Department of Orthodontics of Aarhus University during the period 1993–1995. The material consisted of 30 standardized PAC taken in natural head position. Five examiners had to identify 34 landmarks on each cephalogram. Subsequently, all examiners had to identify again the same 34 landmarks on one randomly selected cephalogram five times with a time interval of at least 24 hours. All landmarks were digitized, related to an X–Y co-ordinate system, and an arithmetical mean was calculated. The accuracy of digitizing was evaluated by digitizing one randomly selected cephalogram 10 times.

The main findings of this study are: (1) The digitizing error is negligible compared to the errors introduced by landmark identification. (2) Each landmark has its own characteristic pattern of variance, which is very similar on both sides. (3) Significant differences in accuracy exist between the various postero-anterior landmarks. The six most accurate landmarks are mastoid left (l) and right (r), latero-orbitale (l) and (r), and antegonion (l) and (r). The six least accurate landmarks are coronoid (l) and (r), condylar (l) and (r), and mandibular foramen (l) and (r). (4) A significant difference in the accuracy of landmark identification between the five examiners was only seen for seven of the 34 landmarks. (5) No evidence was found that one examiner was consistently better/worse than the others. (6) No improvement in the accuracy was found after repeated identification, thus there seems to be no short-term ‘learning process’.

Refereed Paper

Key words: Cephalometrics, Error of Identification, Landmark Identification, Posterior Anterior Cephalometrics.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Gazit-Rappaport, E. Gazit, and M. Weinreb Quantitative evaluation of lip symmetry in skeletal asymmetry Eur J Orthod, August 1, 2007; 29(4): 345 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Good, R. Edler, D. Wertheim, and D. Greenhill A computerized photographic assessment of the relationship between skeletal discrepancy and mandibular outline asymmetry Eur J Orthod, April 1, 2006; 28(2): 97 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]