J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nute, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Moss, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nute, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Moss, J. P.
British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 27, No. 1, 31-38, March 2000
© 2000 British Orthodontic Society


Scientific Section

Three-dimensional facial growth studied by optical surface scanning

Spencer J. Nute, B.D.S. (HONS.), M.SC., M.ORTH. R.C.S. (ENG.), F.D.S.R.C.S. (ENG.) and James P. Moss, B.D.S., PH.D., F.D.S.R.C.S. (ENG.), D.ORTH. R.C.S. (ENG.)

Department of Orthodontics, Dental Institute, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AD, U.K.

Abstract

The objective of the investigation was to study the three-dimensional growth of the face, and to examine the hypothesis that there are three-dimensional differences between the faces of boys and girls. The subjects comprised 132 British Caucasians aged 5–10 years measured by optical surface scanning in this cross-sectional study. Average scans for each age and sex subgroup were superimposed to assess the differences with age and sex. Males were generally larger than females. The greatest difference was between the facial heights and the least in the mid-facial dimensions. The face height of both sexes increased by an average of 3–4 mm annually. Mid-face prominence and width altered little. Mandibular width increased by 1–3 mm a year, rising to 3–5 mm in some years at the inferior areas of the mandibular region. Mandibular prominence also increased. Nose height and prominence and alar base width increased by 2 mm per year on average. Dorsum width changed little. Boys were generally larger than girls. Growth in facial height was greatest. Mid-face prominence and width changed little with age, whilst the prominence and width of the lower face increased more. Nasal prominence and alar base width increased at most ages. Dimensions changed more than reported by cephalometric studies, possibly as this study included the soft tissues.

Refereed Scientific Paper

Key words: Facial Growth, Childhood, Optical Surface Scanner, Three-dimensions




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
B. K. Cha, J. Y. Lee, P.-G. Jost-Brinkmann, and N. Yoshida
Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology
Eur J Orthod, August 1, 2007; 29(4): 325 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
J. Moss
The use of three-dimensional imaging in orthodontics
Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2006; 28(5): 416 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 British Orthodontic Society.