J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Munajed, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mccabe, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al-Munajed, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mccabe, J. F.
Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 27, No. 3, 255-260, September 2000
© 2000 British Orthodontic Society


Scientific Section

The Use of a Cyanoacrylate Adhesive for Bonding Orthodontic Brackets: an ex-vivo study

M. Kusai Al-Munajed, D.D.S., DiP. OrtH.*, P. H. Gordon, PH.D., B.D.S., F.D.S., M.ORTH.* and J. F. Mccabe, D.SC.{dagger}

* Departments of Child Dental Health and
{dagger} Dental Materials Science Unit, Framlington Place, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4BW, U.K.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a cyanoacrylate orthodontic adhesive with regard to tensile bond strength and bond failure location in comparison with a conventional no-mix orthodontic composite adhesive using stainless steel and ceramic brackets.

One-hundred-and-twenty caries-free extracted premolar teeth were used in this study. There were 30 specimens for each tooth, adhesive, and bracket combination, and of these half were tested at 24 hours and half at 3 months. Hence, there were 15 samples in each test group. Bond strengths were assessed using an Instron Universal Testing Machine after storage for 24 hours and for 3 months at 37°C in distilled water.

Analysis of variance showed the mean bond strength of specimens bonded with cyanoacrylate was significantly lower than for those bonded with Right-on (P < 0•001). Weibull analysis showed that at a given stress the probability of failure significantly increased after 3 months for brackets bonded with cyanoacrylate. A Chi-square test of the ARI scores revealed no significant difference among the groups tested.

This study showed that cyanoacrylate adhesives are unsuitable for use as a bonding agent in routine orthodontic practice.

Key words: Adhesion, Cyanoacrylate, Dental Materials, Orthodontic Brackets.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
S. A. Clark, P. H. Gordon, and J. F. McCabe
An ex vivo investigation to compare orthodontic bonding using a 4-META-based adhesive or a composite adhesive to acid-etched and sandblasted enamel
J. Orthod., March 1, 2003; 30(1): 51 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 British Orthodontic Society.