HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Littlewood, S. J. Articles by Greenwood, D. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Littlewood, S. J. Articles by Greenwood, D. C.

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate Brackets Bonded with a Hydrophilic Primer

¹ Department of Orthodontics, St Luke's Hospital, Little Horton Lane, Bradford, UK
² Sub-unit for Medical Statistics, Epidemiology & Health Services Research, 71–75 Clarendon Road, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical failure rates of brackets bonded using a prototype hydrophilic primer, designed to be insensitive to moisture, with brackets bonded with a conventional primer.

Design: Single centre randomised controlled clinical study. Thirty-three patients were bonded using a split mouth technique: randomly allocating the hydrophilic primer to one side of the mouth and a conventional primer to the other.

Setting: Hospital orthodontic department, Bradford, UK.

Subjects: Orthodontic patients requiring fixed appliances

Main outcome measures: The site and time to bond failure was recorded for each bracket that failed over 6 months.

Results: Using survival analysis, there was an increased risk of bracket failure when bonded with the hydrophilic primer compared with the conventional primer (hazard ratio = 2•2, 95% confidence interval: 1•1 to 4•5, P = 0•01).

Conclusions: This hydrophilic primer cannot be recommended for routine clinical use.

Key words: Hydrophilic Primer, Moisture Insensitive Primer, Orthodontic Bonding, Randomised Controlled Trial

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. A. Wenger, S. Deacon, and N. W. T. Harradine A randomized control clinical trial investigating orthodontic bond failure rates when using Orthosolo universal bond enhancer compared to a conventional bonding primer J. Orthod., March 1, 2008; 35(1): 27 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Wendl, H. Droschl, and P. Muchitsch Indirect bonding--a new transfer method Eur J Orthod, February 1, 2008; 30(1): 100 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Reis, J. E. d. Santos, A. D. Loguercio, and J. R. de Oliveira Bauer Eighteen-month bracket survival rate: conventional versus self-etch adhesive Eur J Orthod, February 1, 2008; 30(1): 94 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Manning, S. M. Chadwick, D. Plunkett, and T. V. Macfarlane A randomized clinical trial comparing 'one-step' and 'two-step' orthodontic bonding systems J. Orthod., December 1, 2006; 33(4): 276 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Murfitt, A. Quick, M. Swain, and G. Herbison A randomised clinical trial to investigate bond failure rates using a self-etching primer Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2006; 28(5): 444 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Mavropoulos, A. Karamouzos, G. Kolokithas, and A. E. Athanasiou In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial J. Orthod., June 1, 2003; 30(2): 139 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]