J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, C. I.
Right arrow Articles by Bearn, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, C. I.
Right arrow Articles by Bearn, D. R.
Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 28, No. 4, 307-311, December 2001
© 2001 British Orthodontic Society


Scientific Section

Computer-aided Learning (CAL): an effective way to teach the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN)?

Christopher I. Lowe, Jean L. Wright and David R. Bearn

Department of Dental Medicine and Surgery, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Dr D. R. Bearn, Unit of Orthodontics, Department of Dental Medicine and Surgery, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, UK (E-mail: david.bearn{at}man.ac.uk).

Abstract

Objective: To identify if a lecture or access to a computer aided learning (CAL) programme is more effective in teaching undergraduate dental students IOTN.

Design: Prospective controlled trial.

Setting: University Dental Hospital of Manchester, 1999

Subjects: Eighty-five 3rd year undergraduate dental students allocated by pseudo-randomisation to two groups. The first group received a lecture and seminar on IOTN, and the second group were given a seminar and access to a purpose written CAL programme.

Main Outcome Measure: A standard test was given to the two groups in the form of ten sets of patient records that they had to score with IOTN Dental Health Component (DHC) and Aesthetic Component (AC).

Results: There was no difference in mean score for the two groups with AC score (5•02 and 5•03). The CAL group of students performed best for DHC grade (mean score 5•41 compared with 4•24 for lecture group) and this was statistically significant (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Undergraduate dental students can learn to use IOTN as well or better when using a CAL programme compared with a lecture.

Key words: Computer aided learning, IOTN, Teaching method, Undergraduate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
A. J. Ireland, A. S. A. Smith, D. M. Alder, J. R. Sandy, and S. M. Chadwick
Current Products and Practice: Building a learning community on-line: the first step towards a national virtual learning environment in orthodontics
J. Orthod., September 1, 2005; 32(3): 214 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 British Orthodontic Society.