J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, J.
Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 29, No. 1, 66-69, March 2002
© 2002 British Orthodontic Society

Features Section

An introduction to digital radiography in dentistry

J. Brennan

St Luke's Hospital, UK

Address for correspondence:
J. Brennan, Department of Orthodontics, St Luke's Hospital, Bradford, BD5 0NA, UK.

Abstract

The aim of this article is to explain the basic principles of digital radiography, and to discuss the intra- and extra-oral imaging systems currently available. There are two main types of digital sensors available. One is based on charge coupled device technology and the other consists of phosphor storage plates. The advantages and disadvantages of each are highlighted with particular attention to orthodontics.

Key words: Charge coupled devices, digital radiography, orthodontics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur J OrthodHome page
E. Celik, O. Polat-Ozsoy, and T. U. Toygar Memikoglu
Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis
Eur J Orthod, June 1, 2009; 31(3): 241 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur J OrthodHome page
O. Polat-Ozsoy, A. Gokcelik, and T. U. Toygar Memikoglu
Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods
Eur J Orthod, June 1, 2009; 31(3): 254 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
F Gijbels, R Jacobs, R Bogaerts, D Debaveye, S Verlinden, and G Sanderink
Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: patient exposure
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2005; 34(3): 145 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
T. K.L. SCHLEYER, H. SPALLEK, W. C. BARTLING, and P. CORBY
The technologically well-equipped dental office
J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2003; 134(1): 30 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 British Orthodontic Society.