|
|
||||||||
Scientific Section |
University Dental Hospital of Manchester, UK
Correspondence: Dr N. A. Mandall, Department of Oral Health and Development, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, UK. Email: mdtmsnam{at}fs1.den.man.ac.uk
Abstract
Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability of a panel of orthodontists for accepting new patient referrals based on clinical photographs.
Sample: Eight orthodontists from Greater Manchester, Lancashire, Chester, and Derbyshire observed clinical photographs of 40 consecutive new patients attending the orthodontic department, Hope Hospital, Salford.
Method: They recorded whether or not they would accept the patient, as a new patient referral, in their department. Each consultant was asked to take into account factors, such as oral hygiene, dental development, and severity of the malocclusion.
Statistics: Kappa statistic for multiple-rater agreement and kappa statistic for intra-observer reliability were calculated.
Results: Inter-observer panel agreement for accepting new patient referrals based on photographic information was low (multiple rater kappa score 0.37). Intra-examiner agreement was better (kappa range 0.340.90).
Conclusion: Clinician agreement for screening and accepting orthodontic referrals based on clinical photographs is comparable to that previously reported for other clinical decision making.
Key words: Clinical photographs, consultant reliability, inappropriate referrals, new patient referrals
Co-investigators: D. Bearn, S. Chadwick, D. Hegarty, D. H. Lewis, C. R. Mattick, J. Sandler, M. Trenouth, K. D. O'Brien.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Kameyama, Y. Matsumoto, H. Warita, and K. Soma Inactivated periods of constant orthodontic forces related to desirable tooth movement in rats J. Orthod., March 1, 2003; 30(1): 31 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |