J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mandall, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mandall, N. A.
Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 29, No. 2, 125-128, June 2002
© 2002 British Orthodontic Society


Scientific Section

Are photographic records reliable for orthodontic screening?

N. A. Mandall

University Dental Hospital of Manchester, UK

Correspondence: Dr N. A. Mandall, Department of Oral Health and Development, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, UK. Email: mdtmsnam{at}fs1.den.man.ac.uk

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability of a panel of orthodontists for accepting new patient referrals based on clinical photographs.

Sample: Eight orthodontists from Greater Manchester, Lancashire, Chester, and Derbyshire observed clinical photographs of 40 consecutive new patients attending the orthodontic department, Hope Hospital, Salford.

Method: They recorded whether or not they would accept the patient, as a new patient referral, in their department. Each consultant was asked to take into account factors, such as oral hygiene, dental development, and severity of the malocclusion.

Statistics: Kappa statistic for multiple-rater agreement and kappa statistic for intra-observer reliability were calculated.

Results: Inter-observer panel agreement for accepting new patient referrals based on photographic information was low (multiple rater kappa score 0.37). Intra-examiner agreement was better (kappa range 0.34–0.90).

Conclusion: Clinician agreement for screening and accepting orthodontic referrals based on clinical photographs is comparable to that previously reported for other clinical decision making.

Key words: Clinical photographs, consultant reliability, inappropriate referrals, new patient referrals

Co-investigators: D. Bearn, S. Chadwick, D. Hegarty, D. H. Lewis, C. R. Mattick, J. Sandler, M. Trenouth, K. D. O'Brien.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
T. Kameyama, Y. Matsumoto, H. Warita, and K. Soma
Inactivated periods of constant orthodontic forces related to desirable tooth movement in rats
J. Orthod., March 1, 2003; 30(1): 31 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 British Orthodontic Society.