J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trulsson, U.
Right arrow Articles by Berggren, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trulsson, U.
Right arrow Articles by Berggren, U.
Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 29, No. 3, 197-204, September 2002
© 2002 British Orthodontic Society


Scientific Section

A qualitative study of teenagers’ decisions to undergo orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance

U. Trulsson1, M. Strandmark1, B. Mohlin2 and U. Berggren2

1 Nordic School of Public Health, Göteborg, Sweden
2 Göteborg University, Sweden

Bengt Mohlin, Göteborg University, Faculty of Odontology, Box 450, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden. E-mail: mohlin{at}odontologi.gu.se

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to describe thoughts and values influencing young people’s choices to undergo orthodontic treatment.

Subjects and methods Twenty-eight patients (11 boys), aged 13–19 years, at an orthodontic clinic in the western part of Sweden participated. Open, taped interviews, lasting about 1 hour, were conducted with each subject and analysed by the grounded theory method. Five descriptive categories, each related to several subcategories, were generated in the analysis and labelled: ‘being like everyone else’, ‘being diagnosed’, ‘focusing on the mouth’, ‘obeying social norms’ and ‘forced decision-making’.

Outcome Category forced decision-making was identified as a core category, describing the power in the social process, resulting in the decision to undergo orthodontic treatment.

Conclusions Motivation for the decision to undergo orthodontic treatment seemed to be social norms, and the beauty culture in their reference group and in society in general. The teenagers were not fully conscious of these external influences. Their opinion, as a group, was that they had made an independent decision to undergo orthodontic treatment.

Key words: decision-making, grounded theory, interviews, malocclusion, orthodontic treatment, teenager




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
J. Stirling, G. Latchford, D. O. Morris, J. Kindelan, R. J. Spencer, and H. L. Bekker
Elective orthognathic treatment decision making: a survey of patient reasons and experiences
J. Orthod., June 1, 2007; 34(2): 113 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
R. M. A. Kiekens, J. C. Maltha, M. A. van 't Hof, and A. M. Kuijpers-Jagtman
A measuring system for facial aesthetics in Caucasian adolescents: reproducibility and validity
Eur J Orthod, December 1, 2005; 27(6): 579 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 British Orthodontic Society.