J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, J. W.
Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 29, No. 4, 330-334, December 2002
© 2002 British Orthodontic Society


Features Section

Current Products and Practice

An audit of the current consent practices of consultant orthodontists in the UK

A. W. Gardner and J. Warren Jones

North Cheshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Warrington, UK

A. W. Gardner, Department of Orthodontics, North Cheshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Warrington Hospital, Lovely Lane, Warrington WA5 1QG, UK. E-mail: A.W.Gardner{at}liverpool.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective: To collect information on the current consent practices of consultant orthodontists for orthodontic and joint orthognathic treatment.

Design: Postal questionnaire.

Subjects and Methods: The questionnaire was sent to all 222 consultant orthodontists held on the database of the British Orthodontic Society. The questionnaire consisted of five multi-part questions requiring tick-box responses.

Outcome: A total of 199 questionnaires were returned.

Results: Written information on orthodontic treatment was provided by 56 per cent of respondents whilst 41 per cent obtained written consent. Written information on joint orthognathic treatment was provided by 47.5 per cent of respondents, whilst 20 per cent obtained joint written consent. Most who obtained written consent for orthodontics and joint orthognathic treatment used 16 years as an appropriate age for patients to provide their own consent.

Conclusions: Consent practice amongst consultant orthodontists varies, with 35 per cent providing neither written information nor seeking written consent prior to orthodontic or joint orthognathic treatment.

Key words: Consent, Consultant Orthodontist, Orthodontics, Orthognathic Surgery




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
D. Chappell and C. Taylor
A survey of the consent practices of specialist orthodontic practitioners in the North-West of England
J. Orthod., March 1, 2007; 34(1): 36 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
J. Sandler, S. Sira, and A. Murray
Photographic 'Kesling set-up'
J. Orthod., June 1, 2005; 32(2): 85 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 British Orthodontic Society.