HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Harrison, J. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Harrison, J. E.

Clinical trials in orthodontics I: demographic details of clinical trials published in three orthodontic journals between 1989 and 1998

Liverpool University Dental Hospital and School of Dentistry, UK

Dr J. E. Harrison, Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, Liverpool University Dental Hospital and School of Dentistry, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5PS, UK. E-mail:
Jayne.Harrison{at}rlbuh-tr.nwest.nhs.uk

Abstract

Aim: To test the hypothesis that there is insufficient evidence available, from clinical trials, to allow evidence-based decisions to be made on the effectiveness of orthodontic treatment.

Objectives: To identify reports of orthodontic clinical trials and assess their demographic characteristics.

Design: A retrospective, observational study.

Setting: The American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, British Journal of Orthodontics, and European Journal Orthodontics.

Data source: Clinical trials published between 1989 and 1998.

Method: A hand-search was performed to identify all clinical trials. The journal and year of publication, research method, interventions, and sample size of the trials reported were recorded.

Results: One-hundred-and-fifty-five trial reports were identified of which 56 (36.1%) were published from 1989 to 1993 and 99 (69%) from 1994 to 1998. Ninety-nine (69%) reports were published in the AJO-DO, 18 (11.6%) in the BJO and 38 (24.5%) in the EJO. Eighty-five (54.8%) were reports of randomized controlled trials and 70 (45.2%) of controlled clinical trials. The interventions most frequently assessed were bonding materials (21.9%), growth modification treatments (21.3%), and oral hygiene procedures (9.0%). The median sample size was 32 (IQR 19.5, 50).

Conclusion: There is sufficient evidence available from clinical trials to warrant doing systematic reviews of orthodontic clinical trials to aid decision-making.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. P. Y. Hichens, J. R. Sandy, H. N. Rowland, A. G. McNair, S. Clark, D. Hills, P. Huntley, S. Ransome, M. Forty, J. Peak, et al. Practical aspects to undertaking research in the primary care setting: experience from two studies J. Orthod., December 1, 2005; 32(4): 262 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]