J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kameyama, T.
Right arrow Articles by Soma, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kameyama, T.
Right arrow Articles by Soma, K.
Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 30, No. 1, 31-37, March 2003
© 2003 British Orthodontic Society


Scientific Section

Inactivated periods of constant orthodontic forces related to desirable tooth movement in rats

T. Kameyama, Y. Matsumoto, H. Warita and K. Soma

Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan

Dr T. Kameyama, Orthodontic Science, Department of Orofacial Development and Function, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1–5–45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8549, Japan. E-mail:
kame.orts{at}tmd.ac.jp

Abstract

Aim: To examine the effects of inactive periods of force on the amount of tooth displacement and root resorption during experimental tooth movement in rats.

Sample: Sixty 11-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats.

Method: The maxillary first molar (M1) was moved mesially using a removable titanium-nickel alloy closed coil spring for 14 days. The rats were divided into four groups with, 0, 1, 4, and 9 hours of inactivation per day.

Results: Tooth displacement in the 0- and 1-hour groups was significantly greater than that in the 9-hour group. The area of root resorption in the 4- and 9-hour groups was significantly less than that in the 0- and 1-hour groups. There was no significant difference in root resorption between 0- and 1-hour groups, and also between 4- and 9-hour groups.

Conclusion: The distance of tooth displacement gradually decreased as the inactive period increased, whereas root resorption suddenly decreased between 1 and 4 hours of inactive orthodontic force.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 British Orthodontic Society.