J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, M.
Right arrow Articles by Power, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, M.
Right arrow Articles by Power, S.
Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 30, No. 2, 155-158, June 2003
© 2003 British Orthodontic Society


Scientific Section

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Pre-coated and Non-pre-coated Brackets

M. Wong and S. Power

North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK.

Dr M. Wong, Department of Orthodontics, The North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK. Email: mwong{at}nhh.u-net.com

Objective: To compare the clinical failure rate of pre-coated brackets and brackets bonded using Transbond XT light cure system

Outcome measures: (i) The clinical time required for bond up of upper and lower arches of both systems, (ii) bond failure rate for the first 6 months.

Design: Single centre randomized controlled clinical study. Thirty-three patients were bonded using a split mouth technique: randomly allocating the pre-coated brackets to upper left and lower right quadrants, and non-pre-coated brackets to the other quadrants.

Setting: Hospital Orthodontic Department, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.

Subjects: Orthodontic patients requiring fixed appliances.

Main outcome measures: The site and time to bond failure was recorded for each bracket that failed over the first 6 months. The time required to bond upper and lower arches was measured using a stopwatch for each patient.

Results: t-Test for the difference of mean time needed to apply both groups of brackets, no significant difference (P > 0.2) was found. A chi-squared test for the difference in bracket failure between pre-coated (8.06%) and non-pre-coated (7.37%) showed no significant difference in bracket failure (P > 0.2).

Conclusions: The clinical failure rate of pre-coated brackets is not significantly lower than conventional non-pre-coated brackets.

Key words: Pre-coated brackets, bondfailure, bonding time




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
S. Sunna and W. P. Rock
Effect of sandblasting on the retention of orthodontic brackets: a controlled clinical trial
J. Orthod., March 1, 2008; 35(1): 43 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
N. Manning, S. M. Chadwick, D. Plunkett, and T. V. Macfarlane
A randomized clinical trial comparing 'one-step' and 'two-step' orthodontic bonding systems
J. Orthod., December 1, 2006; 33(4): 276 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 British Orthodontic Society.