J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larmour, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stirrups, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larmour, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stirrups, D. R.
Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 30, No. 3, 225-228, September 2003
© 2003 British Orthodontic Society


Scientific Section

An ex vivo assessment of a bonding technique using a self-etching primer

C. J. Larmour1 and D. R. Stirrups2

1 Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, UK
2 Dundee Dental Hospital and School, UK

C. J. Larmour, Orthodontic Department, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Cornhill Road, Aberdeen AB25 5ZG, UK. Email: Colin.Larmour{at}arh.grampian.scot.nhs.uk

Objective: This study assessed a new self-etch/priming system for use in orthodontic bonding.

Setting: An ex vivo study.

Method: Three groups of 20 extracted premolar teeth were bonded with metal orthodontic brackets. Group 1 was bonded with Transbond using the conventional technique (control). Group 2 was bonded using the new Transbond-PlusTM combined etch/primer system to wet enamel and Group 3 to dry enamel. The teeth were debonded using an Instron Universal Testing Machine. The mean debond force was calculated for each group and compared statistically. The teeth were examined under the stereomicroscope to assess the site of debond and adhesive remnant index.

Results: Group 2 (etch/primer on wet enamel) had the lowest mean debond value at 5.2 MPa. ANOVA and Tukey tests confirmed that the bond strength results of Group 2 were significantly lower than Groups 1 (P < 0.01) and 3 (P < 0.05). The enamel/resin interface was the commonest site of bond failure for both etch/primer groups (Groups 2 and 3). They had less retained resin and significantly (P < 0.001) lower ARI scores compared with Group 1 (control).

Conclusions: The results of this ex vivo study suggest that the self-etch primer should achieve adequate bond strengths when applied to dry enamel surfaces. In addition there should be less retained resin requiring removal at debond.

Key words: Adhesive remnant index, orthodontic bonding, self-etching primer




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
B. Wendl, H. Droschl, and P. Muchitsch
Indirect bonding--a new transfer method
Eur J Orthod, February 1, 2008; 30(1): 100 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
K. House, A. J. Ireland, and M. Sherriff
An in-vitro investigation into the use of a single component self-etching primer adhesive system for orthodontic bonding: a pilot study.
J. Orthod., June 1, 2006; 33(2): 116 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
A. Vicente, L. A. Bravo, and M. Romero
Self-etching primer and a non-rinse conditioner versus phosphoric acid: alternative methods for bonding brackets
Eur J Orthod, April 1, 2006; 28(2): 173 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
K. House, A. J. Ireland, and M. Sherriff
An Investigation into the Use of a Single Component Self-etching Primer Adhesive System for Orthodontic Bonding: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
J. Orthod., March 1, 2006; 33(1): 38 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 British Orthodontic Society.