J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Redahan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lagerström, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Redahan, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lagerström, L.
Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 30, No. 3, 237-244, September 2003
© 2003 British Orthodontic Society


Scientific Section

Orthodontic treatment outcome: the relationship between anterior dental relations and anterior inter-arch tooth size discrepancy

S. Redahan and L. Lagerström

Dublin Dental Hospital, Eire

Department of Public and Child Dental Health, Dublin Dental Hospital, Lincoln Place, Dublin 2, Ireland. Email: sredahanortho{at}hotmail.com

Objective: This study investigated the pre- (T1) and post-treatment (T2) relationship between anterior (canine to canine inclusive) inter-arch tooth size ratio and various dental and skeletal variables.

Design: Retrospective longitudinal clinical study.

Setting: Swedish Health Board Clinic 2000.

Subjects: Random selection of T1 and T2 orthodontic records of 137 Swedish patients (56 male and 81 female). The sample included non-extraction (77), and four premolar extraction (60) cases across a range of dental and skeletal malrelationships.

Main outcome measures: Dental cast and lateral cephalogram measurements were recorded. Exploratory modelling investigated whether a significant relationship existed between the anterior inter-arch tooth size ratio and these measurements.

Results: Data was normally distributed with no statistically significant differences between males and females (P = 0.88) and extraction and non-extraction (P = 0.52) treatment modalities with respect to the anterior ratio. T1 bivariate regression analysis failed to show a relationship (p < 0.05) between variables. T2 bivariate analysis showed a statistically significant relation between three variables and anterior tooth size ratio. Multiple regression analysis led to a final model where maxillary inter-canine width (P = 0.002) and upper arch crowding (0.001) were statistically significantly related to the anterior inter-arch ratio. The coefficient of determination was however uniformly low (R2 < 0.2) for all variables.

Conclusion: The anterior inter-arch tooth size ratio was not associated with any common pre- or post-treatment variables in the population studied, therefore measurement of an anterior tooth size ratio pre-treatment was not clinically beneficial for determining anterior dental relations post-treatment.

Key words: Bolton ratio, inter-arch tooth size ratio, tooth size, tooth size ratio







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 British Orthodontic Society.