J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 31, No. 1, 41-46, March 2004 doi:10.1179/146531204225011300
© 2004 British Orthodontic Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benson, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, I. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benson, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, I. F.

Article

Fluoridated elastomers: effect on disclosed plaque

P. E. Benson and A. A. Shah

School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, UK

I. F. Campbell

Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Liverpool, UK

Address for correspondence: Dr P. E. Benson, Department of Oral Health and Development, School of Clinical Dentistry, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield S10 2TA, UK. Email: p.benson{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Objective: To investigate the effect of fluoridated elastomers on the quantity of disclosed dental plaque surrounding an orthodontic bracket in vivo.

Design: A randomized, prospective, longitudinal clinical trial, employing a split mouth, crossover design.

Setting: The Orthodontic Departments of Liverpool and Sheffield Dental Hospitals.

Subjects and methods: The subjects were 30 individuals about to start fixed orthodontic treatment. The study consisted of two experimental periods of 6 weeks with a washout period between. Fluoridated elastomers were randomly assigned at the first visit to be placed around brackets on 12, 11, 33 or 22, 21, 43. Non-fluoridated elastomers were placed on the contra-lateral teeth. After 6 weeks (visit 2) the elastomers were removed, the teeth disclosed and a photograph taken. Non-fluoridated elastomers were placed on all brackets for one visit to allow for a washout period. At visit 3, fluoridated elastomers were placed on the contra-lateral teeth to visit 1. At visit 4, the procedures at visit 2 were repeated. The photographs were scanned, then the area and proportion of the buccal surface covered with disclosed plaque was measured using computerized image analysis. A mixed-effects ANOVA was carried out with the dependent variable being the area or percentage area of disclosed plaque.

Results: There was no evidence of a systematic error and substantial agreement for the repeat readings of the same images. The only significant independent variable for the area of disclosed plaque was the subject (p < 0.001). The significant independent variables for the proportion of disclosed plaque were the subject (p < 0.001) and the tooth type (p = 0.002). The independent variable describing the use of fluoridated or non-fluoridated elastomers was not significant for either the area or the proportion of disclosed plaque.

Conclusion: Fluoridated elastomers do not affect the quantity of disclosed plaque around an orthodontic bracket.

Key words: Orthodontics, dental plaque, fluoride, elastomers, randomized clinical trial, image analysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
S.-H. Kim and Y.-K. Lee
Measurement of discolouration of orthodontic elastomeric modules with a digital camera
Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2009; 31(5): 556 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 British Orthodontic Society.