J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 31, No. 2, 98-104, June 2004 doi:10.1179/146531204225020373
© 2004 British Orthodontic Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duterloo, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sandler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duterloo, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sandler, J.

Article

A comparison of current Orthodontic Board examinations

H. S. Duterloo

Meerssen, The Netherlands

J. Sandler

Chesterfield, UK

Address for correspondence: Herman S. Duterloo, Eijsendaalweg 3 6231 RS Meerssen The Netherlands. Email: dutortho{at}euronet.nl

Five orthodontic clinical Board examinations were systematically compared. An attempt was made to critically evaluate the procedures, characteristics and requirements of these examinations. Many similarities were found and the differences found between Boards may be due to differences in socio-political goals of the professional orthodontic societies organizing the examinations. By setting a high standard of clinical treatment as a basic goal, all Boards aim to raise the overall quality of clinical performance.

Key words: Orthodontics, examinations






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 British Orthodontic Society.