J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 32, No. 1, 20-25, March 2005 doi:10.1179/146531205225020742
© 2005 British Orthodontic Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cousley, R. R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Parberry, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cousley, R. R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Parberry, D. J.

Article

Combined cephalometric and stent planning for palatal implants

R. R. J. Cousley and D. J. Parberry

Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK

Address for correspondence: Mr R. Cousley Orthodontic Department, Peterborough District Hospital Thorpe Road, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire PE3 6DA, UK. Email: Richard.Cousley{at}pbh-tr.nhs.uk

Several aspects of palatal implant usage are technique sensitive. In particular, problems during the insertion stage may compromise implant osseo-integration, or its subsequent ease of handling and effectiveness. This paper describes a systematic approach to combined cephalometric and model planning, and subsequent stent fabrication for Orthosystem® palatal implants. The authors recommend this protocol in order to optimize three-dimensional control of implant positioning, and to both simplify and standardize the insertion stage.

Key words: Orthodontic anchorage, Orthosystem®, implant stent, palatal implant




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
L. G. Favero, A. Pisoni, and C. Paganelli
Removal torque of osseointegrated mini-implants: an in vivo evaluation
Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2007; 29(5): 443 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
K. A. Young, C. A. Melrose, and J. E. Harrison
Skeletal anchorage systems in orthodontics: absolute anchorage. A dream or reality?
J. Orthod., June 1, 2007; 34(2): 101 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
J. Prabhu and R. R. J. Cousley
Current Products and Practice: Bone anchorage devices in orthodontics
J. Orthod., December 1, 2006; 33(4): 288 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 British Orthodontic Society.