HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Harrison, J. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Harrison, J. E.

Orthodontic Clinical Trials III: Reporting of ethical issues associated with clinical trials published in three orthodontic journals between 1989 and 1998

Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, Liverpool University Dental Hospital and School of Dentistry, Liverpool, UK

Address for correspondence: J. E. Harrison, Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, Liverpool University Dental Hospital and School of Dentistry. Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5PS, UK. Email: Jayne.Harrison{at}rlbuht.nhs.uk

Aims: The aims of this study were to assess whether reports of orthodontic clinical trials complied with the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Design: A retrospective observational study.

Setting: The American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (AJODO), Journal of Orthodontics (formerly and up until 1999 known as the British Journal of Orthodontics, BJO) and European Journal of Orthodontics (EJO).

Data source: Clinical trials published between 1989 and 1998.

Method: A hand search was performed to identify all clinical trials. Each trial report was assessed for inclusion of a statement that ethical approval and/or informed consent had been obtained.

Results: One-hundred-and-fifty-five papers were identified, of which 85 (54.8%) were reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 70 (45.2%) of controlled clinical trials (CCTs). 16.1% (25/155), of the trial reports stated that ethical approval had been obtained and a quarter (39/155, 25.1%) indicated that informed consent had been obtained.

Conclusions: Most orthodontic clinical trial reports failed to state whether ethical approval and/or informed consent had been obtained. The reporting of the ethical issues associated with orthodontic clinical trials could be improved further not only by the instructions to authors in orthodontic journals stating the need for studies to comply with the Declaration of Helsinki, but also by Journal editors refusing to publish trials that do not comply.

Key words: Clinical orthodontic research, clinical trials, ethical issues, randomized clinical trials, reporting

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. P. Y. Hichens, J. R. Sandy, H. N. Rowland, A. G. McNair, S. Clark, D. Hills, P. Huntley, S. Ransome, M. Forty, J. Peak, et al. Practical aspects to undertaking research in the primary care setting: experience from two studies J. Orthod., December 1, 2005; 32(4): 262 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]