|
|
||||||||
Scientific Section |
Department of Child Dental Health, Bristol Dental Hospital, Bristol, UK
Department of Dental Biomaterials Science, Guys Hospital, London, UK
Address for correspondence: Dr A. J. Ireland, Department of Child Dental Health, Bristol Dental Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK Email: tony.ireland{at}tiscali.co.uk
Objective: This study assessed the in vivo bond failure of the single component orthodontic self-etching primer system, Ideal 1 (GAC Orthodontic Products) and compared it with the conventional acid etching using a conventional 37% o-phosphoric acid, rinsing and drying regimen when bonding stainless steel orthodontic brackets to enamel.
Design: Prospective randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Setting: Orthodontic Department, Bristol Dental School.
Material and methods: Twenty consecutive patients undergoing upper and lower fixed orthodontic treatment entered this cross-mouth control study. Diagonally opposite quadrants were randomly allocated to either the self-etching primer group or the conventional etching group. A total of 339 teeth were bonded with Ideal 1 light-cured adhesive. Bond failures and locus of bond failure were then recorded at 1, 6 and 12 months.
Results: Significantly more bond failures occurred at each of the 3 time intervals, 1, 6 and 12 months, where the enamel was pretreated with the Ideal I self-etching primer, than when the enamel was treated with the conventional etchant, 37% o-phosphoric acid. With the latter the cumulative bond failure rates were 3.0, 5.3 and 14.8%, respectively. With the self-etching primer the cumulative failure rates were 29.4, 56.5 and 72.4%.
Conclusion: The study found that enamel pre-treatment with the Ideal 1 self-etching primer system prior to orthodontic bonding results in an unacceptably high bond failure rate when compared with conventional enamel acid etching.
Key words: Bonding, composite, self-etching primer
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Elekdag-Turk, D. Isci, T. Turk, and F. Cakmak Six-month bracket failure rate evaluation of a self-etching primer Eur J Orthod, April 1, 2008; 30(2): 211 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Wenger, S. Deacon, and N. W. T. Harradine A randomized control clinical trial investigating orthodontic bond failure rates when using Orthosolo universal bond enhancer compared to a conventional bonding primer J. Orthod., March 1, 2008; 35(1): 27 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Banks and B. Thiruvenkatachari Long-term clinical evaluation of bracket failure with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial J. Orthod., December 1, 2007; 34(4): 243 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Wenger, N. E. Atack, C. N. Mitchell, and A. J. Ireland Peri-operative second molar tube failure during orthognathic surgery: two case reports J. Orthod., June 1, 2007; 34(2): 75 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Manning, S. M. Chadwick, D. Plunkett, and T. V. Macfarlane A randomized clinical trial comparing 'one-step' and 'two-step' orthodontic bonding systems J. Orthod., December 1, 2006; 33(4): 276 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |