HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Othman, S. A. Articles by Harradine, N. W. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Othman, S. A. Articles by Harradine, N. W. T.

Tooth-size Discrepancy and Bolton’s Ratios: a literature review

Bristol Dental Hospital, Bristol, UK

Address for correspondence: Mr N. W. T. Harradine, Department of Child Dental Health, University of Bristol Dental School, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK. Email: Nigel.Harradine{at}bristol.ac.uk

Objectives: To review the literature on Bolton’s tooth-size discrepancies (TSD) with specific attention to the prevalence of TSD, and the possible influence of different classes of malocclusion, gender and racial group. Also examined were the validity of the standard deviations from Bolton’s samples as an indicator of significant TSD, methods of measurement of TSD and their reproducibility. Based on the review, suggestions are made as to how future work could be improved.

Results and conclusions: Studies have reported from 20 to 30% of people with significant tooth-size anterior discrepancies and 5–14% for overall TSD. Bolton’s original sample was appropriate for indicating what ratio is most likely to be associated with an excellent occlusion, but was not suited to indicating the size or prevalence of significant TSD. Most studies use samples that are not likely to be representative of orthodontic patients in the UK or, indeed, elsewhere. Although some statistically significant differences have been reported, gender and racial group seem unlikely to have a clinically significant influence on Bolton’s tooth-size ratios. Class III malocclusions may have larger average ratios. Computerized methods of measurement are significantly more rapid. Most studies performed or reported their error analysis poorly, obscuring the clinical usefulness of the results. Studies are needed to properly explore the reproducibility of measurement of TSD and to appropriately determine what magnitude of TSD is of clinical significance.

Key words: Bolton’s ratios, literature review, tooth-size discrepancy

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. K. Al-Omari, Z. B. Al-Bitar, and A. M. Hamdan Tooth size discrepancies among Jordanian schoolchildren Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2008; 30(5): 527 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Commentaries on scientific papers published in this edition J. Orthod., December 1, 2007; 34(4): 233 - 233. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Othman and N. W. Harradine Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: the reproducibility and speed of two methods of measurement J. Orthod., December 1, 2007; 34(4): 234 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]