|
|
||||||||
Scientific Section |
Department of Oral Health and Development, School of Clinical Dentistry, Sheffield, UK
Department of Oral Pathology, School of Clinical Dentistry, Sheffield, UK
Address for correspondence: Philip Benson, Department of Oral Health and Development, Institution School of Clinical Dentistry, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK., Email: p.benson{at}sheffield.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
Objective: To measure the effectiveness of ultrasonic cleaning for decontaminating orthodontic molar bands following size determination using a quantitative antibody capture assay technique.
Design: A prospective, cross-sectional, clinical and laboratory investigation.
Setting: The Orthodontic Department of the Charles Clifford Dental Hospital and the Microbiology Laboratory of the School of Clinical Dentistry, Sheffield.
Participants: Thirty-two patients about to start orthodontic treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances.
Methods: Four first molar bands were tried in the mouth and then removed. They were randomly assigned either for no decontamination (control) or to be decontaminated in an ultrasonic cleaning bath for 15 minutes (experimental). The bands were placed in a predetermined volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for albumin, to detect the presence of blood and amylase, to detect the presence of saliva.
Results: Fifty per cent of decontaminated molar bands showed detectable amounts of amylase, albumin or both. The quantity of detectable amylase was significantly reduced on the cleaned compared with uncleaned bands (P = 0.036); however, the reduction in the quantity of albumin was not statistically significant (P = 0.074).
Conclusions: Ultrasonic cleaning for 15 minutes reduces, but does not always eliminate, salivary proteins (amylase) from tried-in bands. It is less effective at removing serum protein (albumin). There is a need, therefore, to investigate effective means of cleaning organic material from orthodontic bands if they are to be adequately sterilized and reused.
Key words: Orthodontics, decontamination, cross-infection control, ELISA
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Luther Award winning papers. So what? J. Orthod., December 1, 2007; 34(4): 209 - 212. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Luther With great pleasure: a prize for best scientific paper, and finding out what readers think J. Orthod., September 1, 2007; 34(3): 153 - 153. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |