J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 36-45, March 2007 doi:10.1179/146531207225021897
© 2007 British Orthodontic Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chappell, D.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chappell, D.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, C.

Scientific Section

A survey of the consent practices of specialist orthodontic practitioners in the North-West of England

Danielle Chappell

Westcliffe Dental Practice, Blackpool, UK

Christine Taylor

Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool, UK

Address for correspondence: C. Taylor, Orthoworld, 24 Whitegate, Drive, Blackpool, Lancashire, FY3 9AQ, UK., Email: kctaylor{at}btinternet.com


   Abstract

Objective: To use a questionnaire to obtain information on the consent practices of specialist orthodontic practitioners in the North-West of England and highlight any areas for improvement.

Design: Postal questionnaire.

Setting: This survey was conducted among specialist practitioners in 2005–2006.

Subject and methods: A questionnaire was sent to 84 specialist practitioners on the specialist register in the North-West of England. This consisted of six sections with a mixture of yes/no responses and a section that determined for which subjects consent was obtained and how.

Outcome: Responses were received from 58 (69%) practitioners. Ten were discounted.

Results: Forty-five (94%) of the 48 practitioners who responded routinely obtained consent from patients, and 27 (60%) used a consent form. Of these 27, 16 (59%) forms were based on a recommended design from an organization such as the British Orthodontic Society. Twenty-three (85%) practitioners gave the form to the patient/parent to read themselves, and 24 (89%) got the consent form signed by the patient/parent. Eighteen (67%) forms were countersigned by the orthodontist or an assigned member of staff. Seventeen (63%) practitioners gave the patient a photocopy. Of the 45 respondents who did obtain consent from their patients, seven (16%) practitioners assigned the consent process to a member of staff. Twenty-eight (62%) respondents would allow a patient under 16 to consent to treatment, with the youngest age being 10 years.

Conclusions: Forty-five (94%) specialist practitioners who responded did routinely obtain consent from patients for treatment, but 18 (40%) did not use a consent form. The subjects discussed with the patient varied. Areas for improvement are highlighted.

Key words: Consent, orthodontics, specialist orthodontic practitioner







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 British Orthodontic Society.