HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stirling, J. Articles by Bekker, H. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stirling, J. Articles by Bekker, H. L.

Elective orthognathic treatment decision making: a survey of patient reasons and experiences

Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

D. O. Morris

Leeds Dental Institute, Leeds, UK

J. Kindelan

York Hospital, York, UK

R. J. Spencer

Pinderfields Hospital, Wakefield, UK

H. L. Bekker

Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Address for correspondence: Dr Hilary L Bekker, Senior Lecturer in Behavioural Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, 15 Hyde Terrace, Leeds LS2 9LT, UK. Email: h.l.bekker{at}leeds.ac.uk

	Abstract

Objective: Few studies have explored decisions about orthognathic treatment (OGT) from the patient’s perspective. This study describes the factors associated with the patient’s decision to have or not have orthognathic treatment, and assesses whether the process can be considered to be informed decision making.

Design: A cross-sectional survey employing both interview and questionnaire methods, conducted in four OGT services in Yorkshire.

Sample: Participants were patients aged over 16 years, either making an OGT decision over a 6-month period or had made their treatment choice 18–42 months prior to the study start date in 2003.

Measures: Questionnaires assessed patient demographics, dental history and psychopathology (anxiety, satisfaction with self, body satisfaction, facial appearance); interviews explored patients’ reasons for, and experiences of, orthognathic treatment.

Results: Of 138 patients approached, 61 participated (mean age 25 years, 66% female). Psychopathology scores were within the normal range. The thematic content analysis of interview transcripts found: reasons given for having OGT were to improve the ‘bite’, as well as gaining a more normal facial appearance; most patients reported the service information was satisfactory, but about half made negative comments, with some reporting staff communications made them feel worse; knowledge of OGT risks and benefits was poor; patients had strong emotions about their facial appearance and the orthognathic treatment they received, which did not seem to be addressed by current practice.

Conclusions: Some OGT patients do not appear to be making informed decisions about their treatment. They seem to have unmet needs in relation to support for their decision making, and managing the emotional effects of undergoing and adjusting to treatment. The implications for information provision, assessment and support during treatment are discussed.

Key words: Informed choice, orthodontics, attitudes, treatment decisions, orthognathic surgery

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. S. Ryan, J. Shute, and S. J Cunningham A qualitative study of orthognathic patients' perceptions of referral to a mental health professional: Part 1--questionnaire development J. Orthod., June 1, 2009; 36(2): 85 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. B. Al-Bitar, I. K. Al-Omari, H. T. Al-Ahmad, M. A. El Maaytah, and S. J. Cunningham A comparison of health-related quality of life between Jordanian and British orthognathic patients Eur J Orthod, May 28, 2009; (2009) cjp034v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Cunningham and J. Shute Orthognathic treatment: see how they feel? J. Orthod., March 1, 2009; 36(1): 61 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]