J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 34, No. 3, 194-199, September 2007 doi:10.1179/146531207225022194
© 2007 British Orthodontic Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flores-Mir, C.
Right arrow Articles by Major, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flores-Mir, C.
Right arrow Articles by Major, P. W.

Scientific Section

Longitudinal study on TMJ disk status and its effect on mandibular growth

C. Flores-Mir, L. Akbarihamed, B. Nebbe, G. Heo and P. W. Major

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Address for correspondence: Dr Carlos Flores-Mir, Director of the Craniofacial & oral-Health Evidence-based Practice Group (www.coepg.org), 4051A Dentistry/Pharmacy Centre, Department of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2N8, Canada., Email: carlosflores{at}ualberta.ca


   Abstract

Objective: This longitudinal study assessed the potential contribution of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disk status over mandibular linear and angular changes.

Design: Cohort study.

Setting: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Participants: Seventy-three adolescent subjects attending TMJ or orthodontic clinics with or without TMJ disk abnormality were followed during a mean 3 years 7 months. From this sample 39 subjects underwent orthodontic treatment.

Methods: Disk displacement and disk length measurements taken from MRIs were utilized to evaluate the TMJ disk status. Mandibular changes were quantified from cephalometric radiographs by superimposing the mandible around the internal cortex of the posterior wall of the mandibular symphysis. Fishman’s skeletal maturation system was used to calculate the percentage of mandibular growth remaining during the follow-up. This expected mandibular growth was factored out through a statistical normalization process applied to the actual difference between the initial and final mandibular measurements. In addition, previous orthodontic treatment was also considered for the analysis. A multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to evaluate interaction between the independent variables (TMJ disk status and previous orthodontic treatment) over the dependent variables (mandibular ramus, mandibular body, mandibular length and gonial angle measurements).

Results: No significant contribution was found of any of the evaluated variables or its interactions over the mandibular measurements.

Conclusions: No evidence was found of TMJ disk abnormality as an associated significant factor with mandibular dimensional changes. The findings have to be evaluated with caution because of some limitations identified in this study.

Key words: Temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome, growth and development, mandible







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 British Orthodontic Society.