HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Squeff, L. R. Articles by Gouvêa, J. P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Squeff, L. R. Articles by Gouvêa, J. P

Asymmetric headgear for differential molar movement: a study using finite element analysis

Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Address for correspondence: Antônio Carlos Oliveira Ruellas, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Email: antonioruellas{at}yahoo.com.br

	Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of four different asymmetric headgear systems.

Design: A mathematical method for three-dimensional data called finite element analysis.

Setting: The Orthodontic Department, the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro and the Metallurgical Engineering Department of the Fluminense Federal University.

Methods: Four systems of delivering an asymmetrical force to headgear were studied: using face-bow arms of different lengths, a symmetric face-bow with one of the arms bent outward in relation to the internal arch, a symmetric face-bow used in combination with a transpalatal arch activated to produce an asymmetric force, and a symmetric face-bow with the outer bow soldered to the inner bow on the side where a larger force will be applied.

Results: All four systems were effective in promoting asymmetric distal movement of the molars. However, the symmetrical face-bow with the outer bow soldered to the inner bow (system 4) could be used in asymmetric mechanics if the bows are soldered on the opposite side to the proposed distalization. Lateral and occlusal displacing forces were observed in all systems as well as tip-back and rotational movements.

Conclusion: The simulated computer model used in this investigation suggests that a face-bow with a symmetrically soldered joint and arms of equal lengths used in combination with a transpalatal arch is the best headgear option when asymmetric movement of upper molars is desired.

Key words: Asymmetrical force, headgear system, class II malocclusion, orthodontic treatment