|
|
||||||||
British Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 9, 149-153, Copyright © 1982 by British Orthodontic Society
ARTICLES |
FJ Calvert
The cephalometric radiographs of 29 Class II division 1 cases treated with the Andresen appliance were assessed and compared with those of 19 untreated Class II division 1 cases. The findings do not support the opinion that the Andresen appliance influences the growth of the skeletal structures of the maxilla and mandible. The overjet was reduced by lingual tipping of the maxillary incisors, whilst the overbite was reduced by increased eruption of both the maxillary and mandibular molars. Associated with this was a small improvement in molar relationship. The amount of lower incisor proclination was also small, presumably due to the effectiveness of the acrylic capping in controlling their axial inclination.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. Varlik, A. Gultan, and N. Tumer Comparison of the effects of Twin Block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile Eur J Orthod, April 1, 2008; 30(2): 128 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lohrmann, R. Schwestka-Polly, H. Nagerl, D. Ihlow, and D. Kubein-Meesenburg The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study Eur J Orthod, December 1, 2006; 28(6): 553 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Turkkahraman and M. O. Sayin Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects Eur J Orthod, February 1, 2006; 28(1): 27 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |