| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Unit of Dental and Oral Health, Dundee Dental School, Park Place, Dundee DD1 4HR, UK
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract Genetics, Principles and...SummaryReferences |
|---|
Key words: Craniofacial Growth, Environment, Genetics, Malocclusion, Orthodontic Treatment
|
Genetics, Principles and Terminology |
|---|
|
TopAbstractGenetics, Principles and...SummaryReferences |
|---|
Consideration of the heritability of a particular feature or trait requires a consideration of the relationship between genotype and phenotype. Genotype is defined as the genetic constitution of an individual, and may refer to specified gene loci or to all loci in general. An individual's phenotype is the final product of a combination of genetic and environmental influences. Phenotype may refer to a specified character or to all the observable characteristics of the individual. The proportion of the phenotypic variance attributable to the genotype is referred to as heritability.
Genetic variation in man may be observed at two levels. In specific traits individual genotypes are readily identified and differences are qualitative (discrete), for example, the ABO blood antigen system. Gene frequencies can be estimated and the Mendelian type of analysis can be applied. In continuous traits such as height, weight, or tooth size differences are characterized quantitatively between individuals. These quantitative traits in man are more elusive to study because they are determined by the alleles of many gene loci and, therefore, the Mendelian type of analysis is not appropriate. They are further modified by environmental conditions which obscure the genetic picture. If the genetic variation of a particular phenotypic trait is dependent on the simultaneous segregation of many genes and affected by environment it is referred to as being subject to multifactorial inheritance. Genetic differences caused by the segregation of many genes is referred to as polygenic variation and the genes concerned are referred to as polygenes. These genes are, of course, subject to the same laws of transmission and have the same general pro- perties as the single genes involved in qualitative traits, but segregation of genes is translated into genetic variations seen in continuous traits through polygenes.
Different types of genetic `product' can be thought of as being different distances from the fundamental level of gene activity. Enzymes, for instance, are almost direct products of gene action and, in most cases where genetic variation of enzyme structure has been demonstrated, it has been shown that a single locus is responsible for the structure of a single enzyme. The structure and, consequently, the activity of an enzyme is therefore usually simply and directly related to allele substitutions at a single locus. Morphological characters, on the other hand, such as the numerous dimensions used to describe the shape of the face and jaws, are furthest removed from the fundamental genetic level and are the end results of a vast complexity of interacting, hierarchical, biochemical, and developmental processes. Each gene is therefore likely to influence many morphological characters so that a deleterious mutation, although producing a unitary effect at the molecular level, almost always results in a syndrome of morphological abnormalities. When a gene is known to affect a number of different characters in this way its action is said to be pleiotropic. A reverse hierarchy also exists, making each morphological character dependent on many different genes.
Modes of Inheritance
Population genetics deals with the study of the mode of inheritance of traits and the distribution
of genes in populations.
All chromosomes exist in pairs so our cells contain two copies of each gene, which may be alike or may differ in their substructure and their product. Different forms of genes at the same locus or position on the chromosome are called alleles. If both copies of the gene are identical, the individual is described as homozygous, while if they differ, the term used is heterozygous.
The exception to the rule that cells contain pairs of chromosomes applies to the gametes, sperm and ovum, which contain only single representatives of each pair or chromosomes, and therefore, of each pair of genes. When the two gametes join at fertilization, the new individual produced again has paired genes, one from the father and one from the mother. If a trait or disease manifests itself when the affected person carries only one copy of the gene responsible, along with one normal allele, the mode of inheritance of the trait is called dominant (Figure 1a). If two copies of the defective gene are required for expression of the trait, the mode of inheritance is called recessive (Figure 1b).
|
It has been long appreciated that many normal traits, such as height, intelligence, and birth weight, have a significant genetic component, as do a number of common diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia, hypertension, and cleft lip and palate. However, the pattern of inheritance of these traits does not follow the simple modes just described. Mathematical analysis of many of these has led to the conclusion that they follow the rules of polygenic inheritance, that is, are determined by a constellation of several genes, some derived from each parent.
The determination of heritability for polygenic or multifactorial characters is difficult, as a feature of continuous variation is that different individuals may occupy the same position on the continuous scale for different reasons. Using mandibular length as an example, micrognathia can occur in chromosomal disorders, such as Turner's Syndrome, in monogenic disorders such as Treacher Collins Syndrome or Sticklers Syndrome, or due to an intra-uterine environmental problem, such as foetal alcohol syndrome. Combined with this the concept of aetiological heterogeneity encompasses the principle of the same gene defect producing different phenotypic anomalies, and syndromes can be due to defective gene activity in different cells. Conversely, different gene defects or combinations of defective genes can produce a similar phenotypic abnormality. Genetic lethality or reduced reproductive fitness can also complicate the diagnostic picture and genomic imprinting can result in a gene defect `skipping' a generation. These complexities serve to hamper progress in the understanding of polygenic or multifactorial disorders such as orofacial clefting.
Multifactorial inheritance.In contrast to single-gene inheritance, either autosomal or sex-linked, the pedigree pattern does not afford a diagnosis of multifactorial inheritance. In multifactorial traits, the trait is determined by the interaction of a number of genes at different loci, each with a small, but additive effect, together with environmental factors (i.e. the genes are rendering the individual unduly susceptible to the environmental agents). Many congenital malformations and common diseases of adult life are inherited as multifactorial traits and these are categorized as either continuous or discontinuous.
Discontinuous multifactorial traits.This describes traits determined by multiple gene loci which are present or absent depending on the number or nature of the genetic, and/or environmental factors acting. When present these traits can vary continuously. The accepted explanation of discontinuous multifactorial variation rests on the assumption that there is an underlying scale of continuous variation of liability to develop the condition resulting from a combination of all the genetic and environmental influences involved. The condition is present only when the liability exceeds a critical threshold value, and the greater the level of liability beyond the threshold the more severe the disease.
More than 20 discontinuous multifactorial traits have been described in humans. Cleft lip and palate is a congenital malformation inherited as a multifactorial trait. In the mildest form the lip alone is unilaterally cleft, whereas in the most severe form the lip is bilaterally cleft and the palatal cleft is complete. The parents of a cleft lip and palate proband are often unaffected, and there may be no family history of cleft lip and palate, but by producing an affected child the parents are deemed to have some underactive genes for lip and palate formation. However, the parents must have sufficient normally active genes to have normally formed lips and palates. Only when the balance exceeds a certain threshold will the malformation occur, and the further the threshold is exceeded, the greater the extent of the malformation. For parents (first-degree relatives) of an affected child the liability curve is shifted to the right (see Figure 2), and so we would expect to find an increased frequency of this malformation amongst parents and other first-degree relatives. With each further degree of relationship the liability curve moves back a step towards the general population position, with a corresponding reduction in the incidence.
|
Some multifactorial traits show an unequal sex ratio. The incidence is increased in the relatives of affected males, but is even more increased in the relatives of affected females. This indicates that for this malformation the female threshold is higher than the male threshold. The parents of an affected female therefore reveal themselves to have a higher proportion of underactive genes, a more displaced liability curve and, hence, they would be at greater risk of having further affected or more severely affected children (especially if male).
In the analysis of a discontinuous trait it is first necessary to show that the incidence in members of affected families is increased above the general population incidence. If the incidence is not increased the condition is probably non-genetic. If it is increased, the pedigree pattern is examined for evidence of single-gene inheritance. If multifactorial inheritance is then suspected, studies of twin concordance and family correlation are necessary.
Continuous multifactorial traits.Many normal human characteristics are determined as
continuous multifactorial traits. These traits by definition have a continuously graded
distribution. Thus, for height there is a range from the very tall to the markedly short with the
mean of 169 ± 6.5 cm in English males (Connor and Ferguson Smith, 1993
). The majority of individuals are centred around the mean. Such distribution is
characteristic of a continuous multifactorial trait. It is important to put malocclusion in context in
this regard—malocclusion should be regarded not as abnormal or as a disease, but as a
variation of occlusion in a continuous multi-factorial trait. Orthodontists may try to impose a
threshold according to treatment need or complexity of mechanical treatment, but this is
superimposed on an infinite range of biological variation.
Aetiologic heterogeneity.Both continuous and discontinuous variation have a
multifactorial basis so that different patients are not necessarily affected for the same reasons.
Thus, although for the majority of CL(P) patients no single cause can be identified, the
malformation can be found in chromosomal disorders for example the Wolf- Hirschhorn
syndrome and trisomy 13 (Patau's syndrome), in monogenic disorders such as the Van
der Woude and popliteal pterygium syndromes. It may also be associated with environmental
teratogens such as alcohol, cigarette smoke and anticonvulsant drugs. Furthermore, there is
evidence for genotype-environment interaction in orofacial clefting, with certain major genes
conferring susceptibility to particular teratogenic agents (Hwang et al, 1995; Shaw et al., 1996).
Population Genetics
Since each chromosome carries hundreds or thousands of genes in a linear order, and there is
intra-species specificity in the gene order, i.e. the same chromosomes contain the same genes,
chromosome maps can be constructed. This enables studies of genetic linkage and
association—usually done by studying the coinheritance of specific alleles of two or more
genes within families. Linkage refers to the closeness of two genes in any of their allelic forms
on the same chromosome. The term association is used when a specific allele of a gene is
associated with a particular condition more frequently than by chance (e.g. alleles of the TGF
gene and clefting), and may imply something about the physiological function of the
product of that allele.
Two more terms commonly used in population genetics are penetrance and expressivity. Penetrance is a statistical term and indicates the proportion of individuals carrying a certain gene who can be detected. As our ability to detect the expression of a gene improves, the penetrance increases. Expressivity refers to the degree of expression of a gene in an individual. For example, full expressivity for osteogenesis imperfecta would include fragile bones, dentinogenesis imperfecta, blue sclerae, and deafness. The presence of one or two of these findings comprises partial expressivity, while the absence of all four occasionally found in carriers of this gene, is zero expressivity.
Population genetics is also concerned with the distribution of genes in the human population. The frequency of various alleles, normal or abnormal, may vary from group to group. The information required to make a decision about the inheritance of a disease can only be obtained through a complete family history with attention to all the factors mentioned above. It is, however, important to appreciate that positive findings in the family history does not eliminate the possibility of an inherited disease, since new mutations, decreased penetrance, or undetected heterozygosity of the parents often mask genetic factors.
Twin studies.Twins are concordant if they both show a discontinuous trait and
discordant if only one shows the trait. As twins usually share a similar family environment it may
be difficult to separate the relative extent of environmental (nurture) and genetic contributions)
(nature) to a multifactorial trait (Emery and Mueller, 1992).
Monozygotic twins have identical genotypes (with some rare exceptions, see below), whereas dizygotic twins are only as alike as siblings. If a condition has no genetic component, for example due to chance or trauma, concordance rates would be expected to be similar for both types of twins. For a single-gene trait or a chromosomal disorder the monozygotic concordance rate will be 100%, whereas the dizygotic rate will be less than this and equal to the rate in siblings. For discontinuous multifactorial traits with both genetic and environmental contributions, the rate in monozygotic twins, although less than 100%, will exceed the rate in dizygotic twins.
In cleft studies, the monozygotic twin concordance rate for CLP and for CP is 35 and 26 per cent,
respectively, and for dizygotic twins 5 and 6 per cent, respectively (Connor and
Ferguson-Smith, 1993). This reflects the heritability of the condition: the higher the
monozygotic concordance, the more important the genetic contribution, and so the higher the
heritability.
Genetic Mutation
Although gene alleles are usually transmitted unaltered from one generation to the next, rare
events occur that cause changes within them. These events are called mutations and an allele that
has undergone such a change is transmitted in its new mutant form. If it occurs during
gametogenesis the mutant allele will appear in a gamete and, consequently, in cells throughout
the body of any resulting individual. If it occurs after fertilization, as a somatic mutation, only a
proportion of cells will be affected.
Mutations of DNA are broadly divisible into length mutations with gain or loss of genetic material, and point mutations with alteration of the genetic code, but no gain or loss of genetic material.
Large deletions remove many adjacent genes (contiguous gene disorders) and these should be suspected if a boy has several X-linked disorders or if a patient with a single-gene disorder has unexplained mental retardation and/or other congenital malformations. In a point mutation a single nucleotide base is replaced by a different nucleotide base [transitions of purine to purine or pyrimidine to pyrimidine adenine (A)-guanine (G) or thymine (T)-cytosine (C); transversions if purine to pyrimidine or vice versa, G-C or A-T]. Most point mutations are spontaneous and unexplained, but certain factors, such as mutagenic chemicals and ionizing radiation, can increase the spontaneous mutation rate. In the absence of such agents, the mutation rate is in the order of one base pair substitution for every billion base pairs replicated.
There are four main groups of chemicals which cause DNA mutations: base analogues which mimic standard bases, but pair improperly (e.g. 5-bromouracil); alkylating agents which add alkyl groups to bases and so hamper correct pairing (e.g. nitrogen mustard or ethyl methanesulphonate); intercalating agents which intercalate with DNA and distort its structure (e.g. deamination by hydroxylamine). As a rule, these mutagens produce point mutations, and the number produced is a function of the concentration of the chemical and duration of exposure. In contrast X-rays rarely cause point mutations, but lead to chromosomal breakage. Ultraviolet light can cause several different types of mutation.
The majority of mutations are likely to cause reduced fitness, a reduced ability of the resulting zygote to contribute progeny to the next generation. In this way, harmful genes tend to be eliminated from the population so that only the more favourable new variants remain. This is natural selection and is responsible for sorting out the best genes for a particular environment. Nevertheless, because mutation occurs at every generation, disadvantageous alleles are always being produced. A balance between the production of disadvantageous alleles through mutation and their elimination by selection results in a permanent presence of harmful alleles in the population, albeit at a low frequency. It is these alleles that are responsible for inherited disease or susceptibility to disease.
Recent Advances in Genetics and Molecular Biology
Craniofacial development in the embryo.Recent advances in molecular biology and in
human genetics have had a considerable influence in the understanding of orofacial genetics. The
Orthodontic speciality is faced with the evidence that genetic factors play a predominant role in
the aetiology of malocclusion (Markovic, 1992). This is backed up by
population studies, especially family and twin studies (Lundstrom, 1954; Schulze and Weise, 1965; Johnston and Hunter, 1989). However, these
studies have also occasionally revealed remarkable differences
between parents and children, between siblings and even between members of monozygotic twin
pairs (Stewart and Spence, 1976), emphasizing the significant role of
environmental factors in the development of occlusion.
Some insight into the genetic mechanisms involved in craniofacial morphogenesis at the molecular level in the embryo assists our appreciation of the role of genetics, not only in the aetiology of craniofacial abnormalities, but also in the regulation of maxillary, mandibular, and tooth morphology.
Facial development in the embryo is demarcated by the appearance of the pre-chordal plate (the cranial end of the embryo) on the fourteenth day of development. One of the most unusual features of vertebrate facial development is the origin of the facial mesenchyme which arises from neural crest cells. Unusually, they disrupt the ectodermal-mesodermal junction and migrate into the underlying tissue as ectomesenchymal cells. Migration and division of neural crest cells are extremely important in facial development. During their migration they undergo a number of interactions with the extra-cellular matrix, and with adjacent epithelia to determine the nature and patterning of the neural, skeletal and connective tissue structures they will form. Among the derivatives of the cephalic neural crest cells are the maxilla, mandible, zygomatic, nasal bones, and bones of the cranial vault.
Although the cessation of neural crest cell migration and the factors that cause neural crest cells to localize in particular regions are not yet completely understood, their migration into the branchial arches occurs in a highly regulated manner. This process is presumed to be under the control of genes known as homeobox genes, which endow neural crest cells (NCC) with a positional identity, which mediates aspects of craniofacial morphogenesis and patterning.
The role of cell adhesion molecules.Cell adhesion molecules such as cadherins,
integrins, immunoglobulins, and proteoglycans are glycoproteins on the external surface of the
cell membranes, and are thought to be important in embryogenesis, particularly organ formation.
In craniofacial development the precise positioning of the neural crest cells in the branchial
arches may involve changes in expression of cell adhesion molecules are expressed and down
regulated in neural crest cells during their pre-migratory and migratory stages. The down
regulation of molecules such as the cadherins could alter the attachment of cells to one another
allowing them to migrate (Baldwin et al., 1996; Kerrigan et al., 1998). At a somewhat later stage, the cell adhesion
molecule, syndecan, is expressed as the palatal shelves elevate from vertical to horizontal, and
expression decreases during fusion (Fitchett et al., 1990). It is
thought that these changes in expression are due to epithelial mesenchymal interactions, and
during the medial edge epithelium breakdown at the time of palatal shelf fusion there is an
increased expression of N-cadherin. This may be instrumental in the transformation of epithelium
to its different phenotypes nasal and oral and into mesenchyme. Epithelial mesenchymal
interaction during the bud and cap stages of tooth folicle formation is also thought to be
dependent on the action of cell adhesion molecules, especially syndecan (Bernfield et al., 1993).
The role of homeobox genes.Homeobox genes are genes which are highly conserved throughout evolution of diverse organisms and are now known to play a role in patterning the embryonic development. As such, they are likely to be fundamental in evolution of the specialised body parts of many animal species and the differences between different organisms can be explained by the different modes of action of the homeobox genes. These can also be regarded as master genes of the head and face controlling patterning, induction, programmed cell death, and epithelial mesenchymal interaction during development of the craniofacial complex.
Those of particular interest in craniofacial development include the Hox group, Msx1 and Msx2
(muscle segment), Dlx (distalless), Otx (orthodontical), Gsc (goosecoid), and Shh (sonic
hedgehog). The
proteins encoded by these homeobox genes are transcription factors which control the
transcription of RNA from the DNA template within the cell nucleus. Transcription factors can
switch genes on and off by activating or repressing gene expression, and therefore control other
genes producing a co-ordinated cascade of molecular events which, in turn, control patterning
and morphogenesis (Thesleff, 1995). At a cellular level this control is
expressed through two main groups of regulatory proteins, the growth factor
family and the steroid
/ thyroid
/retinoic acid
super family (Evans, 1988). These regulatory molecules in the
mesenchyme such as fibroblast growth factor (FGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF),
transforming
growth factor alpha (TGF), transforming growth factor beta (TGFß), and bone
morphogenetic proteins BMPs are the vehicles through which homeobox gene information is
expressed in the co-ordination of cell migration and subsequent cell interactions that regulate
growth (Johnston and Bronsky, 1995). By this means different parts of
the DNA are activated in different cells regulating the different proteins, enzymes, etc., produced
by different tissues and organs. These mechanisms will hold the key to understanding disease and
dysmorphology, and are the subject of intensive research in craniofacial biology. Some examples
relevant to craniofacial development serve to illustrate how this is providing new insights.
Molecular genetics in oral and craniofacial dysmorphology.Molecular genetics studies
using animal models for human malformations enables elucidation of pathogenetic mechanisms.
For example, mice with retinoic acid syndrome (RAS) have illustrated major neural crest cell
involvement (Sulik et al., 1988) and in similar human
syndromes such as hemifacial microsomia neural crest involvement is implicated. Later
administration of retinoic acid in mice in excessive doses kills ganglionic placodal cells and leads
to a malformation complex virtually identical to the Treacher Collins syndrome.
Craniosynostosis, premature closure of cranial sutures, is a common birth defect in humans,
occurring in approximately 1:2500 live births (Cohen, 1993) and
premature suture closure has also been found to have its origins in neural crest cell disorders.
Through molecular genetics the mechanisms which underlie craniosynostosis are beginning to be
unravelled. Considerable progress in elucidating the developmental origin and morphogenesis of
a craniofacial skeleton has been made through pioneering studies by Noden (1991) and by Couly and colleagues (1993).
Mutations in fibroblast growth factor FGF receptor genes are known to affect suture development
in mice and humans, and such mutations have been found to occur in Apert, Crouzon and
Pfeiffer syndromes (Wilkie, 1997). In suture formation the FGF is
thought to provide a signal from the dura mater preventing cells from undergoing premature
ossification at presumptive sutures (Opperman et al., 1995), and
the FGF receptor mutation disrupts these progenitor osteoblast cells to differentiate and causes
fusion to occur prematurely. Also, mutations in two transcription factors, MSX2 and TWIST,
cause Boston type craniosynostosis and Saethre-Chotzen syndrome respectively (Jabs
et al., 1993; Howard et al., 1997, el Ghouzzi et al., 1997).
Other examples of autosomal dominant cranofacial abnormalities are cleidocranial dysplasia and
Treacher Collins syndrome. In cleidocranial dysplasia mutations have been found in the core
binding factor 1 gene (CBFA1). This results in defects in the membranous bones of the cranial
vault and clavicles due to deficiencies in signalling between the periostium and chondrocytes
essential for endochrondral bone formation (Mundlos et al., 1997). The Treacher Collins syndrome locus has been mapped to the long arm of
chromosome 5 (Dixon, 1996) and numerous mutations spread throughout
the gene affecting the production of the treacle protein can produce the anomaly. Hypoplastic
mandible and zygomatic bones, cleft palate, and conductive deafness are features and although
the genetic defects have been mapped identified, the pathogenesis of these disorders remains
unknown.
Molecular genetics in dental development.The first sign of tooth development is a local
thickening of oral epithelium, which subsequently invaginates into neural crest-derived
mesenchyme and forms a tooth bud. Subsequent epithelial folding and rapid cell proliferation
result in first the cap, and then the bell stage of tooth morphogenesis. During the bell stage, the
dentine producing odontoblasts and enamel secreting ameloblasts differentiate. Tooth
development, like the development of all epithelial appendages, is regulated by inductive tissue
interactions between the epithelium and mesenchyme (Thesleff, 1995).
There is now increasing evidence that a number of different mesenchymal molecules ad their
receptors act as mediators of the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during tooth development.
Of the bone morphogenetic proteins, BMP2, 4, and 7 mRNAs shift between the epithelium and
mesenchyme in the regulation of tooth morphogenesis (Aberg et al., 1997). The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family have also been localized in epithelial
and
mesencymal components of the tooth by immunohistochemistry (Cam et al.,
1992); and in dental mesenchyme tooth development and shape is regulated by FGF8
and FGF9 via downstream factors MSX1 and PAX9 (Kettunen and Thesleff, 1998).
Control of tooth development.Homeobox genes have particular implications in tooth
development and, therefore, on Orthodontics. Muscle specific homeobox genes Msx-1 and
Msx-2 appear to be involved in epithelial- mesenchymal interactions, and are implicated in
craniofacial development, and in particular in the initiation, developmental position (Msx-1) and
further development (Msx-2) of the tooth buds (MacKenzie et al., 1991; Jowett et al., 1993). Further evidence of the role of
Msx1 comes from gene knock-out experiments which results in disruption of tooth
morphogenesis among other defects (Satokata and Maas, 1994). Pax9 is
also transcription factor necessary for tooth morphogenesis (Neubuser et al.,
1997). Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are members of the growth factor
family
(TGFß) and they function in many aspects of craniofacial development with tissue specific
functions. BMPs have been found to have multiple roles not only in bone morphogenesis, (BMP
5 for example induces endochondral osteogenesis in vivo), but BMP 7 appears to induce
dentinogenesis (Thesleff, 1995).
Disorders in tooth morphogenesis.Advances in the field of molecular genetics have made great progress in the understanding of a number of dental anomalies with a genetic component.
Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI): this is a group of genetically heterogeneous disorders
affecting enamel formation. It is clinically heterogeneous in that hypoplastic, hypocalcified and
hypomaturation forms have been described (Witkop, 1988); and
genetically heterogeneous with families exhibiting autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive and
X-linked inheritance (Witkop, 1988; Crawford and Aldred,
1992; Franco et al., 1995). Also, the prevalence
appears to vary quite significantly between 1:14,000 (Witkop and Rao, 1971) and 1:700 (Backman and Holm, 1986). In humans, two
amelogenes, AMGX and AMGY, have been cloned and mapped to the X and Y chromosomes,
respectively (Lau et al., 1989) and in (1997) MacDougall et al. mapped the ameloblastin gene within the critical region
for autosomal dominant AI at chromosome 4q21. It is likely, however, that mutations in several
genes may be involved in the aetiology of different forms of autosomally inherited AI.
Dentinogenesis imperfecta (DI): this is autosomal dominant and occurs in
approximately 1:8000 live births. It presents with brownish discolouration of the teeth, crowns
susceptible to rapid attrition, fragile roots and pulp chamber obliteration due to abnormal
continuous production of dentine matrix (Shields, 1973). DI also presents
a number of sub-types, one of which is coupled with osteogenesis imperfecta in which there is an
alteration in type 1 collagen genes. Most patients with this type of dentinogenesis imperfecta
have mutations and deletions for amino acid substitutions in genes with encode for sub-units of
type 1 collagen (Bonadio et al., 1990; Ganguly et al., 1991; Nicholls et al., 1996). The
structural defects in the collagen type 1 molecules affects the extra cellular matrix formation,
resulting in the pathogenesis of DI.
Hypodontia: muscle specific homeobox gene (MSX1) is strongly expressed in the
dental mesenchyme throughout the bud, cap and bell stages of odontogenesis (Mackenzie et al., 1992). Satokata and Maas (1994)
found that mice with the Msx1 gene knocked out had amongst other defects, complete failure of
tooth development at the E13.5 bud stage. More recently, Vastardis et al. (1996) demonstrated that a mutation in MSX, the human counterpart of murine msx1,
caused familial tooth agenesis, and genetic linkage analysis of a family with autosomal dominant
agenesis of second premolars and third molars identified a locus on chromosome 4p as the site of
the MSX1 gene.
Ectodermal dysplasia (EDA): hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia is a heterogeneous
disorder with many clinically distinct types, and is characterized by the triad of hypotrichosis
(sparse hair), hypohydrosis (lack of sweat glands), and hypodontia (reduced number of teeth).
The hypodontia in EDA varies from a few missing teeth to complete anodontia; and tooth shape
abnormality and tooth size can also be affected (Kere et al., 1996; Thesleff, 1996). Kere and his colleagues (1996) identified the gene
responsible for X-linked EDA, and it was found to be expressed
in keratinocytes, hair follicles, sweat glands, and in other adult and foetal tissues.
A recent initiative by Yamada et al. (1998) entitled `The
Oral and Craniofacial Genome Project' seeks to set up collaborative laboratory research
projects on human and mouse embryonic tissue. The objective is to build up cDNA libraries with
a view to discovering the genes for normal and abnormal oral and craniofacial development.
In summary, two major groups of regulatory proteins including mesenchymal growth factors, bone morphogenetic proteins and the steroid/thyroid/retinoid group are the vehicles through which homeobox gene information is expressed. Their temporal and spatial distribution in the facial structures is being gradually elucidated. Poorly co-ordinated control of form and size of structures (e.g. teeth and jaws), by regulatory genes should do much to explain the frequent mismatches found in dentofacial deformities and indeed in malocclusions. In the search for `candidate genes' involved in maxillary or mandibular dysmorphogenesis, polymorphisms in the homeobox genes and the genes for the molecules that they regulate will be prime targets.
The Role of Epigenetic Factors
The orthodontic profession seems preoccupied with the problem of demonstrating the relative
importance of genetics versus environment in the aetiology of malocclusion rather than
understanding their interaction. A crucial objective in studying a multifactorial trait in man is to
contemplate the effect of genotype/environment interaction. The effect of a particular
environmental factor on phenotype will vary depending on the genetic background because of the
influence of the latter on the response.
It is generally accepted that the basic form of a part of the neurocranium and splanchnocranium is determined genetically in the cartilagenous precursor during embryonic development. However, the form and size of the brain determine the morphology of the membranous cranial bones and regulate the further building up of the neurocranium. Likewise, with facial morphology the basic form of the mandibular body, and the location and morphology of the nasal capsule, which gives rise to the pyriform apertures are genetically determined in the chondrocranium. The form and size of the teeth are also principally genetically determined. growth and the final morphology of the dentofacial structures is undoubtedly influenced by environmental factors, a classical case of gene/environment interaction. The influence of genetic determination on dentofacial morphology does not imply that the genetic information is located solely in the bones, but also in the neurological, muscular and neuromuscular fields, which have an indirect influence on the skeleton. There is no doubt that certain neuromuscular patterning are innate and are under direct genetic influence, and this, in turn, influences muscular posture and behaviour. Mastication, facial expression, speech, and swallowing are examples of neuromuscular patterns, and although there can be conscious control of these activities, there is no basis to suggest that these patterns can be changed permanently or altered to an unconscious level.
Genetic determination and regulation are responsible for the morphogenesis of an individual
during embryonic development. There is ample evidence to indicate that hereditary dentofacial
characteristics can be influenced during post-natal development by general environmental factors
ranging from climate, nutrition, and lifestyle to oral dental pressure habits, muscle malformation,
and Orthodontic treatment. The influence of environmental factors on the retardation of general
somatic growth is apparent in chronic illness, prolonged starvation, and situations of excessive
stress (Tanner, 1965). Although each of the facial bones has a genetically
predetermined size and growth potential (van der Linden, 1966), these
bones are also influenced by related functional muscle attachments and oronasopharyngeal
function which Moss and Salentijn (1969a,b)
refers to collectively as the `functional matrix'. It is important to realize that the
functional matrix encompasses neuromuscular activity which is influenced by genetics, as well as
environmentally-influenced behavioural and postural adaptations. It would, therefore, be
erroneous to believe that craniofacial size and shape are entirely determined either by genetics or
by environmental factors, but by the complex interaction of both and every malocclusion will
occupy a unique slot on the gene/ environment spectrum. This will have a direct bearing on the
more important issue from an orthodontic viewpoint, which is the determination of the extent to
which a particular malocclusion can be influenced by therapeutic environmental intervention, i.e.
the prognosis for orthodontic correction. This issue is addressed in Part 2.
Goodman and Gorland (1970) observed a low tongue position in
mandibular prognathism and a raised lingual dorsum in mandibular retrognathia. Salzmann (1972) highlighted the familial nature of tongue thrusting, jaw posturing
and orofacial soft tissue mannerisms, and the similarity of the resulting occlusions or
malocclusions. A recent twin study by Lauweryns (1995) to investigate
the genetic contribution to a specific craniofacial neuromuscular component, i.e. masseter muscle
reflex latency and peak latency concluded that these are under strong genetic control. This
provides further evidence for the view that genetic control of craniofacial morphogenesis may
reside in the soft tissues. Another aspect of the influence of soft tissues on the position and
occlusion of the teeth, was highlighted by Solow (1980), namely the
dento-alveolar compensatory mechanism. Since soft tissue morphology is considered to be
primarily genetically determined, but soft tissue behaviour influenced by both genetic and
environmental factors the resulting occlusal modifications are of multifactorial aetiology.
A further concept very relevant to the aetiology of malocclusion is that of dento-alveolar disproportion. Inheriting large teeth in a small jaws is a distinct possibility as bone is a mesodermal structure, while tooth enamel is of ectodermal origin. Genetically, most people will develop the normal human dentition of 32 permanent teeth and the implication of functional matrices is that it should be possible to expand the arches to accommodate all 32 teeth in all individuals. If this is not possible, then there must be a genetic aetiology for dentoalveolar disproportion. It is unreasonable to attribute the deficiency in size of the skeletal or dento-alveolar elements in such cases to lack of orofacial nasal pharyngeal function, at least until such claims have been substantiated by scientific evidence. Cases of extreme mandibular prognathism and disproportionately large noses, for example, cannot be explained by functional variation.
The question of whether environment or genetics exerts the greater influence in the aetiology of
malocclusion has been a matter of debate since the origin of orthodontics. As far back as 1891,
Kingsley was unequivocal in his views in describing inheritance as a major factor in producing
malocclusion. (Edward H. Angle 1907), in one of his many papers, was
equally adamant in his belief that malocclusions arise from local causes. This dichotomy is an
unhelpful framework in which to consider the phenomenon of malocclusion and elements from
both schools of thought can be carefully reconciled, even at the level of each individual
orthodontic case scenario,
Studies on asymmetry of traits provide further evidence for environmental influence even during embryonic developmental processes. There are distinct differences between right and left sides in the developing embryo as evidenced, for example, by the contents of the thorax, and the marked differences in function between right and left cerebral hemispheres. Bilateral traits, such as size of teeth on contra-lateral sides of the arch, are however assumed to be under identical genetic control, i.e. are determined by the same genes. If this were true than the phenotypic expression of the trait on the contra-lateral side should be a function of identical developmental processes. Failure of the two sides to develop identically will reflect an underlying genetic instability referred to as developmental noise or interference encountered by the genes during ontogeny, which affects the attempts to render the same developmental message bilaterally.
In 1967, Adams and Niswander reported a significant increase in dental
and dermatoglyphic asymmetry within individuals who also manifested cleft lip and palate. The
authors postulated that polygenic systems normally buffer developmental processes against
adverse environmental effects. However, substitution of deleterious genes caused the level of
buffering to be lowered beyond the point where environmental disturbances may be compensated
and a developmental defect results. Thus, in cleft lip and palate, for which a polygenic basis has
been suggested, the developmental instability is manifested as asymmetry in the dermatoglyphic
and dental patterns. In general, therefore, somatic asymmetry is a phenotypic manifestation of
developmental noise attributable to environmental disturbances during tooth development.
|
Summary |
|---|
|
TopAbstractGenetics, Principles and...SummaryReferences |
|---|
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractGenetics, Principles and...SummaryReferences |
|---|
Adams, M. S. and Niswander, J. D. (1967) Developmental `noise' and a congenital malformation,Genetics Research , 10, 313.
Angle, E. H. (1907) Treatment of Malocclusion of the Teeth, Vol. 58, 7th edn, S S White Manufacturing Company, Philadelphia pp. 52-54.
Backman, B. and Holm, A-K. (1986) Amelogenesis imperfecta: prevalence and incidence in a northern Swedish country,Community Dental Oral Epidemiology , 14, 43 –47.[Medline]
Baldwin, T. J., Fazeli, M. S., Doherty, P. and Walsh, F. S. (1996) Elucidation of the molecular actions of NCAM and structurally related cell adhesion molecules,Journal of Cell Biochemistry , 61,502 –513.[Medline]
Bernfield, M., Hinkes, M. T. and Gallo, R. L. (1993) Developmental expression of the syndecans: possible function and regulation,Development Supplement , 205 –212
Bonadio, J., Ramirez, F. and Barr, M. (1990)
An intron mutation in the human a1(1) collagen gene alters the efficiency of pre-mRNA splicing
and is associated with osteogenesis imperfecta type II,Journal of Biological Chemistry
, 265,2262
–2268.
Cam, Y., Neumann, M. R., Oliver, L., Raulais, D., Janet, T. and Ruch, J. V. (1992) Immunolocalization of acidic and basic growth factors during mouse odontogenesis,International Journal of Developmental Biology 36,381 –398.[Medline]
Cohen, M. M., Jr (1993) Sutural biology and the correlates of craniosynostosis,American Journal of Medical Genetics , 47,581 –616.[Medline]
Connor and Ferguson Smith (1993) Essential Medical Genetics, 4th edn, Blackwell, Oxford.
Couly, G. F., Coltey, P. M. and Le Douarin, N. M. (1993) The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates: a study in quail-chick chimeras,Development , 117, 409 –429.[Abstract]
Crawford, P. J. M. and Aldred, M. J. (1992) X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta—presentation of two kindreds and a review of the literature,Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology , 73, 449 –455.[Medline]
Dixon, M. J. (1996) Treacher Collins Syndrome,Human Molecular Genetics , 5 (Special Issue), 1391 –1396.[Abstract]
el Ghouzzi, V., Le Merrer, M., Perrin-Schmitt, F., Lajeunie, E., Benit, P., Renier, D., Bourgeois, P., Bolcato-Bellemin, A. L., Munnich, A. and Bonaventure, J. (1997) Mutations of the TWIST gene in the Saethre-Chotzen syndrome,Nature Genetics , 15,42 –46.[Medline]
Emery, A. E. H. and Mueller, R. F. (1992) Genetics factors in some common diseases, In: pp. 196-197, Elements of Medical Genetics, Chapter 10.
Evans, R. M. (1988)
The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily,Science
, 240,
889
–895.
Fitchett, J. E., McAlmon, K. R., Hay, E. D. and Bernfield, M. (1990) Epithelial cells lose syndecans prior to epithelial mesenchymal transformation in the developing rat palate,Journal of Cell Biology , 111, 1459.
Franco, E., Hodgson, S., Lench, N., Roberts, G. J. (1995) Nance-Horan syndrome: a contiguous gene syndrome involved deletion of the amelogenin gene? A case report and molecular analysis,Oral Diseases , 1, 8 –11.[Medline]
Ganguly, A., Baldwin, C. T., Strobel, D., Conway, D., Horton, W.,
Prockop, D. J. (1991)
Heterozygous mutation in the G+
5 position of intron 33 of the pro-a2(I) gene (COL1A2) that causes aberrant RNA
splicing and lethal osteogenesis imperfecta,Journal of Biological Chemistry
, 266, 12035
–12040.
Goodman, R. M. and Gorlin, R. J. (1970) In: The Face in Genetic Disorders. C V Mosby Company, St Louis.
Hwang, S. J., Beatty, T. H., Panny, S. R., Street, N. A., Joseph, J. M.,
Gordon, S., McIntosh, L., Francomato, C. A. (1995)
Association study of transforming growth factor alpha (TGFa) TaqI polymorphism and oral
clefts: indication of gene-environment interaction in a population-based sample of infants with
birth defects.American Journal of Epidemiology
, 141, 629
–636.
Howard, T. D., Paznekas, W. A., Green, E. D., Chiang, L. C., Ma, N., Ortiz de Luna, R. I., Garcia Delgado, C., Gonzalez-Ramos, M., Kline, A. D. and Jabs, E. W. (1997) Mutations in TWIST, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, in Saethre-Chotzen syndrome,Nature Genetics , 15, 36 –41.[Medline]
Jabs, E. W., Muller, U., Li, X., Ma, L., Luo, W., Haworth, I. S., Klisak, I., Sparkes, R., Warman, M. L. and Mulliken, J. B. (1993) A mutation in the homeodomain of the human MSX2 gene in a family affected with autosomal dominant craniosynostosis,Cell , 75, 443 –450.
Johnston, M. C. and Bronsky, D. A. (1995) Prenatal craniofacial development: new insights on normal and abnormal mechanisms,Critical Reviews on Oral Biology and Medicine , 6, 368 –422.
Johnston, M. C. and Hunter, W. S. (1989) Cleft lip and / or palate in twins: evidence for two major groups,Teratology , 39, 461.
Jowett, A. K., Vainio, S., Ferguson, M. W., Sharpe, P. T. and Thesleff, I. (1993) Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are required for MSX1 and MSX2 gene expression in the developing murine molar tooth,Development , 117, 461 –470.[Abstract]
Kere, J., Srivastava, A. K. and Montonen, O. (1996) X-linked anhidrotic (hypohidrotic) ectodermal dysplasia is caused by mutation in a novel transmembrane protein,Nature Genetics , 13, 409 –416.[Medline]
Kerrigan, J. J., McGill, J. T., Davies, J. A., Andrews, L. and Sandy, J. R. (1998) The role of cell adhesion molecules in craniofacial development,Journal of Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh , 43, 223 –229.
Kettunen, P. and Thesleff, I. (1998) Expression and function of FGFs-4, -8, and -9 suggest functional redundancy and repetitive use as epithelial signals during tooth morphogenesis,Developmental Dynamics , 211, 256 –268.[Medline]
Lau, E. C., Mohandas, T. K., Shapiro, I. J., Slavkin, H. C., Snead, M. L. (1989) Human and mouse amelogenin loci are on the sex chromosomes,Genomics , 4, 162 –168.[Medline]
Lauweryns, I., Careris, R., Vlietinck, R. and van Steenberghe, D. (1995) The poststimulus EMG complex: a genetic study in twins,Journal of Dental Research , 74, 583.
Lundstrom, A. (1954) The importance of genetic and non-genetic factors in the facial skeleton studied in 100 pairs of twins,European Orthodontic Society Report Congress , 30, 92 –107.
MacDougall, M., DuPont, B. R., Simmons, D., Revs, B., Krebsbach, P., Karrman, C., Holmgren, G., Leach, R. J., Forsman, K. (1997) Ameloblastin gene (AMBN) maps within the critical region for autosomal dominant amelogenesis imperfecta at chromosome 4q21,Genomics , 41, 115 –118.[Medline]
MacKenzie, A., Ferguson, M. W. and Sharpe, P. T. (1991) Hox-7 expression during murine craniofacial development,Development , 113, 601 –611.[Abstract]
MacKenzie, A., Ferguson, M. W. J. and Sharpe, P. T. (1992) Expression patterns of the homeobox gene. Hox-8, in the mouse embryo suggest a role in specifying tooth initiation and shape,Development , 115, 403 –420.[Abstract]
Markovic, M. D. (1992)
At the cross-roads of orofacial genetics,European Journal of Orthodontics
, 14,
469
–481.
McIntosh, I. and Francomano, C. A. (1995)
Association study of transforming growth factor alpha (TGF) Taq I polymorphism
and orofacial clefts: indication of gene-environment interaction in a population-based sample of
infants with birth defects,American Journal of Epidemiology
, 141,
629
–636.
Moss, M. L. and Salentijn, L. (1969a) The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth,American Journal of Orthodontics , 55, 566 –575.[Medline]
Moss, M. L. and Salentijn, L. (1969b) The capsular matrix,American Journal of Orthodontics , 56, 474 –489.[Medline]
Mundlos, S., Otto, F., Mundlos, C., Mulliken, J. B., Aylsworth, A., Albright, S. G., Lindhout, D., Cole, W. G., Henn, W., Knoll, J. H. Owen, M. J., Mertelsmann, R., Zabel, B. J., Olsen, B. R. (1997) Mutations involving the transcription factor CBFA1 cause cleidocranial dysplasia,Cell , 89, 773 –779.[Medline]
Neubuser, A., Peters, H., Balling, R. and Martin, G. R. (1997) Antagonistic interactions between FGF and BMP signalling pathways: a mechanism for positioning the sites of tooth formation,Cell , 90, 247 –255.[Medline]
Nichols, A. C., Oliver, J., McCarron, S., Winter, G. B., Pope, F. M. (1996) Splice site mutation causing deletion of exon 21 sequences from the pro a2(I) chain of type I collagen in a patient with severe dentinogenesis imperfecta but very mild osteogenesis imperfecta,Human Mutations , 7, 219 –227.
Noden, D. M. (1991) Cell movements and control of patterned tissue assembly during craniofacial development,Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology , 11, 192 –213.[Medline]
Opperman, L. A., Passarelli, R. W., Morgan, E. P., Reintjes, M. and Ogle, R. C. (1995) Cranial sutures require tissue interactions with dura mater to resist osseous obliteration in vitro,Journal of Bone Mineralisation Research , 10, 1978 –1987.
Salzmann, J. A. (1972) Effect of molecular genetics and genetic engineering on the practice of orthodontics,American Journal of Orthodontics , 61, 437 –472.[Medline]
Satokata, I. and Maas, R. (1994) MSX1 deficient mice exhibit cleft palate and abnormalities of craniofacial and tooth development,Nature Genetics , 6, 348 –356.[Medline]
Schulze, C. and Wiese, W. (1965) Zur Vererburg der Progenie, Fortschr,Kieferorthop , 26, 213 –229.
Shaw, G. M., Wasserman, C. R., Lammer, E. J., O'Malley, C. D., Murray, J. C., Basart, A. M. and Tolarova, M. M. (1996) Orofacial clefts, parental cigarette smoking and transforming growth factor-alpha gene variants,American Journal of Human Genetics , 58, 551 –561.[Medline]
Shields, E. D. (1973) A proposed classification for heritable human dentine defects with a description of a new entity,Archives of Oral Biology , 18, 543 –553.[Medline]
Solow, B. (1980) The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications,British Journal of Orthodontics , 7, 145 –161.[Medline]
Stewart, R. E. and Spence, M. A. (1976) The genetics of common dental diseases, In: R. E. Stewart and G. H. Prescott (eds), Oral Facial Genetics, C V Mosby Company, St Louis, pp. 81 –104.
Sulik, K. K., Cook, C. S. and Webster, W. S. (1988) Teratogens and craniofacial malformations,Development , 103, (Suppl.),213 –231.
Taanner, J. M. (1965) Nature and nurture. In relation to growth and development,Royal Institute of Public Health and Hygiene Journal , 28(10), 280 –281.
Thesleff, I. (1995) Homeobox genes and growth factors in the regulation of craniofacial and tooth morphogenesis,Acta Odontologica Scandinavia , 53, 129 –134.[Medline]
Thesleff, I. (1996) Two genes for missing teeth,Nature Genetics , 13, 379 –380.[Medline]
van der Linden, F. P. G. M. (1966) Genetic and environmental factors in dentofacial morphology,American Journal of Orthodontics , 52, 576 –583.[Medline]
Vastardis, H., Karimbux, N., Guthua, S. W. et al. (1996) A human MSX1 homeodomain missense mutation causes selective tooth agenesis,Nature Genetics , 13, 417 –421.[Medline]
Wilkie, A. O. (1997)
Craniosynostosis: genes and mechanisms,Human Molecular Genetics
, 6,
1647
–1656.
Witkop, C. J. (1988) Amelogenesis imperfecta, dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentine dysplasia revisited: problems in classification,Journal of Oral Pathology , 17, 547 –553.[Medline]
Witkop, C. J. and Rao, S. (1971) Inherited defects in tooth structure,Birth Defects , 7, 153 –184.
Yamada, Y., Lee, S. K. and Yamada, K. M. (1998) Oral and Craniofacial Genome Project,Journal of Dental Research , 77, special issue B (IADR abstracts), 884.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Zhou, Y. Lu, X.H. Gao, Y.C. Chen, J.J. Lu, Y.X. Bai, Y. Shen, and B.K. Wang The Growth Hormone Receptor Gene is Associated with Mandibular Height in a Chinese Population Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 2005; 84(11): 1052 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T Lauc, P Rudan, I Rudan, and H Campbell Effect of inbreeding and endogamy on occlusal traits in human isolates J. Orthod., December 1, 2003; 30(4): 301 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
