J. Orthod.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atherton, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Moseley, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atherton, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Moseley, H. C.
Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 26, No. 4, 334, December 1999
© 1999 British Orthodontic Society


Letters to the Editor

Re: Forestadent Travel Award

J. D. Atherton

56 Rodney Street, Liverpool L1 9AD, U.K.

Dear Sir,

I would like to congratulate Mr Moseley on winning the Forestadent Travel Award, and on the excellent standard of presentation and treatment of the three cases presented. However, I note that none of the cases are shown at any length of time out of retention. This is not in any way meant as a criticism. I appreciate how hard it is to meet a deadline. Nevertheless, it is always interesting to see cases out of retention. Relapse can occur and I would think that the third case presented would be prone to relapse.

Let us hope none of the cases have relapsed, but either way it would be very interesting to know, since Mr Moseley has clearly done everything in his power to make a success of treatment. Can we have an update please.

Yours sincerely


 
H. C. Moseley

Dear Sir,

I would like to thank Dr Atherton for his interest and observations concerning the treatment of the cases presented for this award. I am assuming that the comment stating the possibility of future relapse of the result obtained for the third case relates to either:

  1. changes in incisor alignment; or
  2. stability of the open bite closure, achieved by a combination of second molar extraction, vertical growth modification, and a small amount of lower incisor extrusion.

At the most recent review of this patient, aged 17 years, the open bite had remained stable. She was continuing to wear removable retainers on a part-time basis to maintain incisor alignment. This decision reflected her excellent compliance with regard to appliance wear during active treatment and, ideally, should continue at least until third molars have completed eruption. I appreciate that this level of cooperation may not be achievable for all patients presenting with a similar malocclusion. My clinical impression was that facial growth was complete at the end of active treatment.

A variable degree of post-treatment change in alignment and occlusal relationships can be identified in the majority of cases that present with a significant malocclusion. If the long-term result following treatment is a stable occlusion that is aesthetically acceptable, I would not consider that this constitutes post-treatment relapse.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atherton, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Moseley, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atherton, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Moseley, H. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS