|
|
||||||||
Editorial |
The acceptance rates are shown in Table 1
. Our acceptance rate for 2001 is 42% and this is comparable to other specialist journals. All the manuscripts that are received at the office are sent out for review to at least two reviewers. Fortunately, we have not had to take the step of rejecting a paper before being sent to reviewers. We will, however, do this if the paper is not written according to the instructions to authors. Equally rare is our acceptance of a paper without changes. Most papers are returned to the authors with recommendations for them to make some changes. A small proportion are not re-submitted. This does cause some problems in trying to plan future editions of the Journal, and we have decided that if an author does not resubmit a paper within three months, it will have to go out to referees again.
|
|
These figures reflect that the Journal of Orthodontics is doing well in terms of time for authors and readers can be reassured that we are doing our best in publishing papers that are current and not held up in long queues for publication.
Lastly, this is the final time that the Journal will have sections in which the photographs are in monochrome. Oxford University Press have managed to provide a full colour journal at no additional cost. As a result, the Journal will continue to be an excellent forum for orthodontics throughout the world.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Luther Acceptance and publication times: change for changes' sake? J. Orthod., June 1, 2007; 34(2): 73 - 74. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |