|
|
||||||||
Article |
|
Fluorides, orthodontics and demineralization: a systematic review of RCTs and CCTs P. E. Benson, D. T. Millett, A. A. Shah, F. Dyer, N. Parkin and R. S. Vine |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The authors have reviewed the literature in the style of a Cochrane systematic review. This follows a strict methodology ensuring only high quality evidence is assessed. Randomized or controlled clinical trials that investigated the prevention of white spot lesions by using fluoride during fixed appliance treatment were assessed. A thorough, reproducible and transparent search strategy was followed and only those studies that fulfilled strict inclusion criteria were included.
The authors chose the presence or absence of white spot lesions as a clinically relevant primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the size and severity of white spot lesions, quantitative assessment of enamel mineral loss and patient-based outcomes, such as quality of life data.
Fifteen trials were identified, but none fulfilled all the requirements for the review. This was due to deficiencies in the methodology of these studies, which was discussed. The authors concluded that there is some evidence to suggest that a daily sodium fluoride mouthwash or the use of glass ionomer cement for bonding brackets may reduce white spot lesions during fixed appliance treatment. However, these conclusions should be accepted with caution due to the deficiencies discussed in the paper.
The final conclusion that more high quality, clinical research is required is a common conclusion in a number of recent systematic reviews of the orthodontic literature. This at first can be a disappointing conclusion for the busy clinician in search of high quality evidence and answers to common clinical questions. However, like many other papers of this type, this excellent paper serves not only to review what already exists, but describes how future high quality research in this area could be undertaken. This paper will be useful to researchers designing future clinical trials investigating the use of fluoride in orthodontics.
Simon J. Littlewood
Bradford, UK
|
Clinical trials in Orthodontics III: reporting of ethical issues associated with clinical trials published in three orthodontic journals between 1989 and 1998 J. E. Harrison |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The authors of this paper undertook a thorough hand search of 3 orthodontic journals and the findings may surprise the reader. Seventy per cent of 155 reported controlled clinical trials did not include a statement confirming that either ethical approval or consent had been obtained, and only 11% included both. These findings are disappointing in comparison with similar papers in medical journals. Nevertheless, the authors acknowledge that a limitation of their study is that assessing the validity of the findings would require contacting researchers directly to assess whether consent and ethical approval had actually been obtained. It is encouraging, however, that there was some evidence that the frequency of reporting ethical issues was improving with time.
My personal experience is that the ethical approval and consent process is a valuable part of the discipline of planning, executing and publishing a controlled clinical trial. This paper is a timely reminder to us all as clinicians and researchers that we are required to seek appropriate ethical approval and informed consent when planning and carrying out clinical trials. Together with this journals policy of rejecting studies that do not meet the instructions and requirements on these issues, this paper can only help to ensure that future trials are not commenced without the appropriate ethical issues being addressed at the outset.
Chris Johnston
Belfast, UK
|
British Orthodontic Society, Chapman Prize Winner 2003 A novel in vitro culture model to investigate the reaction of the dentine-pulp complex to orthodontic force A. A. Dhopatkar, A. J. Sloan, W. P. Rock, P. R. Cooper, A. J. Smith |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Martyn Cobourne
London, UK
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |