|
|
||||||||
Scientific Section |
Maxillofacial Orthognathics, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
Address for correspondence: Shoichi Suzuki, Maxillofacial, Orthognathics, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental, University, Tokyo, Japan., Email: s-suzuki.mort{at}tmd.ac.jp
Received 13 November 2008; accepted 12 July 2009
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: The Departments of Maxillofacial Orthognathics and Orthodontics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
Participants: Sixteen patients (5 males and 11 females, aged between 13.5 and 27.5 years) with various craniofacial skeletal patterns, who were about to start orthodontic treatment.
Methods: Lateral cephalometric radiographs and MRI scans were obtained and their images uploaded to a computer using a digitizer. The area of the medial pterygoid muscle was selected by binarization from the MRI. The mid-sagittal-plane MRI with a complete superimposed sagittal image of the medial pterygoid muscle was superimposed on the cephalogram using anatomical structures situated in the mid-sagittal plane of the head and shapes that could be identified from both the radiograph and the MRI image.
Results: These combined images showed various shapes of the medial pterygoid muscle. The inclination axis of the medial pterygoid muscle was correlated with various cephalometric variables including SNB (r=0.658), Facial angle (r=0.601), ramus inclination (r=0.676) and Ba-Po% (r=0.585).
The volume of the medial pterygoid muscle was also correlated with cephalometric variables such as ramus inclination (r=0.453), Ba-Nmm (r=0.676), Ba-Po% (depth) (r=0.447), Ar-Go% (depth) (r=0.444) and Ar-Go% (actual length) (r=0.532).
Conclusions: Morphometric analysis using a superimposed image of the medial pterygoid muscle produced from a cephalogram and MRI may help explain the influence of the medial pterygoid muscle inclination axis and volume on the shape of the mandibular bone, especially the shape of the ramus.
Key words: Medial pterygoid muscle, MRI, cephalogram, superimposition, ramus
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim of the current study was to undertake morphological observations of the relationship between the shape and orientation of the medial pterygoid muscle and relate this to the craniofacial morphology in patients with various skeletal patterns. A second objective was to investigate whether the orientation and volume of the medial pterygoid is significantly correlated with craniofacial morphology by superimposing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images on the corresponding cephalograms.
| Subjects and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Samples
The participants were selected from patients about to undergo treatment in the Orthodontic Department of Tokyo Medical and Dental University. To observe the morphological relationship between muscle and the craniofacial skeletal pattern, 16 patients (5 males and 11 females, aged between 13.5 and 27.5 years, mean: 26.2 years for males and 19.1 years for females) with various craniofacial skeletal patterns were approached. The purpose of the study was explained and informed consent obtained. No one refused to take part in the study.
The following examinations were carried out before the start of their orthodontic treatment.
Lateral cephalograms and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
The methods used to obtain and superimpose the lateral cephalogram and MRI images were those described by Higashino.13
Prior to the examination, the patients were instructed to bite into paraffin wax in the intercuspal position, and a wax bite in this occlusal position was prepared. When undertaking the lateral cephalometric radiograph and MRI scan (1.5 T superconducting MRI system, Magnetom Vision, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany), the patients were instructed to occlude into the previously prepared wax bite so that the maxillomandibular positional relationship would not change during imaging. Lateral cephalometric radiography was performed in the sitting position using a standard method. The MRI scan was performed supine with the subject positioned so that the Frankfort plane and the mid-sagittal plane were at a right angle to the plane of the scanner bed. Magnetic resonance imaging scanning was executed in the sagittal direction. T1-weighted images (TR/TE=650/14 msec) were used. Scanning was conducted in three areas (mid-sagittal area and left and right areas of the medial pterygoid muscle), and in each area 20 3 mm-thick slices were scanned with 1-mm movement of the slice site.
Selection and construction of images of the medial pterygoid muscle
The image files of the cephalograms (in bmp format) and MRI scans (in dicom format) were uploaded to computer using a digitizer. The area of the medial pterygoid muscle was selected by binarization (two-level thresholding: a method to convert image with various grey-level into 2 grey-level by choosing threshold values) from the MRI images, using Volume Rugle image-processing software (Medic Engineering, Kyoto, Japan), that were input in layers, and these layers were superimposed using the scale-line displayed on each MRI screen as a reference-axis so that all medial pterygoid muscle images could be projected on the mid-sagittal plane of the MRI.
Superimposition of MRIs and cephalograms
The mid-sagittal-plane MRI with a complete superimposed sagittal image of the medial pterygoid muscle was superimposed on the cephalogram. Hard and soft tissues were shown in black and white inverted in the radiograph and MRI images. Anatomical structures situated in the mid-sagittal plane of the head and shapes that could be identified from both the radiograph and the MRI image were used as references for superimposing the images. The following structures were used for superimposition:
The cephalogram and MRI images were superimposed as follows. First, Sella and point Ba were marked in the cephalogram. Next, both images were superimposed by aligning the centre of the pituitary from the MRI image with Sella. Then the centrifugal edge of the bone marrow of basilar bone from the MRI image was aligned with the line connecting Sella and Ba (Figure 1A–D
). Hence, a superimposed image composed of the cephalogram image and the MRI image in the mid-sagittal plane, including the medial pterygoid muscle was acquired. A superimposed image of the cephalogram and medial pterygoid muscle was then obtained by eliminating the MRI in the mid-sagittal plane.
|
The images were masked and assessed in a random order. The lateral cephalometric radiographs were also measured (Figure 2
). All the measurements were repeated three times by a single observer after a period of 3 weeks.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Correlations between cephalometric variables and muscle inclination axis
Table 2
shows the correlations between the cephalometric variables and the inclination axis of the medial pterygoid muscle. Significant relationships were found between the muscle inclination axis and SNB (r=0.658), facial angle (r=0.601), ANB (r=–0.597), ramus inclination (r=0.676), Ba-Po% (r=0.585), and N-Mmm (anterior facial height) (r=–0.597). Moderate relationships were found between the muscle inclination axis and Y-axis (r=–0.515), Ar-Po% (r=0.432), Ar-Go%(depth) (r=0.491), Ar-Go(height)% (r=0.438), S-G% (r=0.432), and N-M% (r=–0.447).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Higashino13
observed the morphology of the masseter muscle using a similar method, and revealed that the outline of the masseter muscle was primarily rectangular, but in some cases appeared as a parallelogram or trapezoid. He suggested that the different outlines of the masseter muscle appeared to depend on the location and shape of the muscle origin and insertion.
The basic outline of the medial pterygoid muscle depicted on most of superimposed images was in the form of a parallelogram that connected the external plate of the lamina lateralis with the mandibular angular process; however, in some samples it appeared as a rectangle or pentagon. In some of the superimposed images the medial pterygoid muscle originated from the posterior border of the pterygopalatine fossa. In others it originated from below and posterior to the pterygopalatine fossa.
Variation was also observed in the insertion of the medial pterygoid muscle. In some cases, the insertion of the muscle covered the lower two-thirds of the posterior border of the mandibular ramus, while in others it covered the area from the mandibular angle to the lower half of the posterior border of the mandibular ramus. Based on the location and extent of the attached muscle area, the outline of the muscle had either a linear or slightly curved shape. These morphological differences in muscle origin and insertion are thought to be responsible for the differences in muscle shape.
Skeletal morphology and muscle inclination in cephalograms
A definite trend was observed between the morphology of mandibular bone and the inclination axis of the medial pterygoid muscle. In most cases, the upper part of the inclination axis of the medial pterygoid muscle passed through the vicinity of the deepest point of the mandibular notch. Meanwhile, the lower part of the inclination axis passed through the domain between the gonion and antegonion. From our observation, we conclude that the inclination lines of the medial pterygoid muscle might strongly influence the morphology of the articular process, coronoid process and the mandibular angle. Our findings also suggest that the inclination of the medial pterygoid muscle is correlated to the morphology of the mandibular ramus.
Inclination axis and volume of medial pterygoid muscle
Several reports have described the inclination of the medial pterygoid muscle;5
,6
,8
,14
–18
however, these reports have used different reference lines. The results of a study conducted by Ota5
in which the muscle inclination axis was measured using the FH plane as a reference, as in the current study, yielded an average inclination axis of 73.4° (SD 4.1°); however, they observed a more posterior inclination than that observed in the current study. The samples used by Ota5
were taken only from subjects with an Angle class I malocclusion and an average overjet and overbite, whereas the samples used in the current study, with an average ANB of 2.7° are considered to exhibited a tendency towards mandibular protrusion in a Japanese population. This may explain why our data revealed muscle inclination values closer to vertical compared to the results of Ota.5
Previous studies have examined medial pterygoid muscle volume.19
–27
The volume of the medial pterygoid muscle measured in this study was smaller than that obtained by Giohanku,3
who only measured samples from men. Lo19
reported that the volume of the medial pterygoid muscle in women is 66 to 73% smaller than that in men, based on MRI measurements of the volume of the medial pterygoid muscle in square and normal male and female faces. In addition, Lamey20
calculated a value between 5 and 8 cm3 by measuring the volume of the medial pterygoid muscle in nine women and one man. Since women also comprised a large proportion of the subjects in this study (11 women, 5 men), the values for the volume of the medial pterygoid muscle are probably somewhat lower than if the measurements were only taken from men.
Correlations with cephalometric variables
A positive correlation was clearly observed between the muscle inclination axis and ramus inclination based on measurements in this study. This indicates that the inclination axis of the medial pterygoid muscle was closely correlated to the anteroposterior position of the mandibular angle where the medial pterygoid muscle was attached. Specifically, the inclination axis of the medial pterygoid muscle approaches the vertical as the mandibular ramus rotates in a counterclockwise direction and the mandibular angle is positioned anteriorly. Since a counterclockwise or forward rotation of the mandibular ramus pushes the mandibular body out in the anterior direction, both the SNB and facial angle increase while the Y-axis decreases. As shown in the results, a positive correlation was observed between the muscle inclination axis and both the SNB and facial angle, while a negative correlation was observed with the Y-axis, indicating that the inclination axis of the medial pterygoid muscle is closely associated with the anteroposterior location of the mandible. This relationship may be explained by the fact that the muscle connects the inside angle of the mandible to the external plate of the pterygoid process of the sphenoid bone.
Spronsen6
observed a correlation between the inclination axis of the medial pterygoid muscle and the gonial angle, but we did not observe a similar relation in the current study. We did observe a positive correlation between the muscle inclination axis and both mandibular length and posterior lower facial height. In contrast, we observed a negative correlation between the muscle inclination axis and anterior facial height. This suggests the possibility that patients with a long face tend to have a more inclined medial pterygoid muscle and, as a result, lack the ability to suppress vertical growth of the maxillofacial skeleton. These results are consistent with those of Chan.24
An analysis of the relationship between muscle volume and the maxillofacial skeleton revealed a positive correlation between muscle volume and the inclination of the mandibular ramus and also between muscle volume and the length of the mandibular ramus. If we consider that the volume of the medial pterygoid muscle represents the strength of the medial pterygoid muscle, the mandibular ramus tends to be rotated counterclockwise or forward in individuals with high muscle strength. Although both Gionhaku3
and Ota5
observed a correlation between muscle volume and gonial angle, and Ota5
further observed a negative correlation with the mandibular plane angle, similar results were not found in the current study.
Higashino13
analyzed the relationship between the masseter muscle and maxillofacial skeleton using a technique similar to that used in this study, and clearly demonstrated that the masseter muscle volume was negatively correlated with the mandibular plane angle, the gonial angle, and the Y-axis. These results suggest that the medial pterygoid muscle strongly influences the morphology of the mandibular ramus, while the masseter muscle affects the morphology of the mandibular body. Although some correlations were found between the muscle volume and cephalometric variables, further investigations are needed to determine the direct developmental relationship between facial skeletal and muscular morphology.
Methodology
In this study, we developed a new method for superimposing MRI images on cephalograms. The ingenuity of this method lies in displaying the morphology of the medial pterygoid muscle obtained from an MRI and projecting it onto a cephalogram. By superimposing cephalograms and MRI images using the method described here, we might be able to analyze both the morphological relationship of the maxillofacial skeleton and the soft tissues on the superimposed images. Although a CT makes it possible to obtain image data on both hard tissue and soft tissue simultaneously, difficulties are encountered when CT is used to depict soft tissue morphology in detail, and CT also has the disadvantage of exposing the patient to extremely high doses of radiation. On the other hand, MRI can be used to depict the morphology of soft tissue while also eliminating exposure to radiation; hence we decided to use MRI to obtain muscle images in this study; however MRI has the disadvantage of requiring the patient to remain confined for a long period of time during imaging.
Although the number of subjects used in this research was low, the present findings suggest a correlation between the morphology of the maxillofacial skeleton and that of the medial pterygoid muscle. This information may help us to better understand the orientation and morphology of muscle in the maxillofacial region as well as the mechanism of skeletal morphogenesis.
Clinically, this study may provide a basis for future studies on post-operative stability following surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Fukui28
described the importance of appropriate positioning of the proximal segment and countermeasures to reduce stress on the medial pterygoid muscle during orthognathic surgery to reduce postoperative relapse. Based on investigations of the morphology and orientation of the medial pterygoid muscle and post-operative stability, we may be able to gain a better understanding of the relationship between these two factors. It may also be worth investigating the relationship between medial pterygoid muscle morphology and bite force, for which there is little information available compared to the masseter muscle, and comparing the effects of these two muscles on bite force.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Contributors |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 Weijs WA. Hillen B. Correlations between the cross-sectional area of the jaw muscles and craniofacial size and shape. Am J Phys Anthropol 1986; 70:423–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 Gionhaku N, Lowe AA. Relationship between jaw muscle volume and craniofacial form. J Dent Res 1989; 68:805–09.
4 Benington PC, Gardener JE, Hunt NP. Masseter muscle volume measured using ultrasonography and its relationship with facial morphology. Eur J Orthod 1999; 21:659–70.
5 Ota C, Yotsui Y, Kawamoto T. Relationship between craniofacial morpohology and the volume and inclination of the medial pterygoid muscle. Shika Igaku (J Osaka Odontol Soc) 2006; 69(1): 1–8.
6 van Spronsen PH, Koolstra JH, van Ginkel FC, Weijs WA, Valk J, Prahl-Anderson B. Relationships between the orientation and moment arms of the human jaw muscles and normal craniofacial morphology. Eur J Orthod 1997; 19 (3): 313–28.
7 van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Valk J, Prahl Andersen B, van Ginkel FC. Relationships between jaw muscle cross-sections and craniofacial morphology in normal adults, studied with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Orthod 1991; 13 :351–61.
8 Hannam AG, Wood WW. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics. Am J Phys Anthropol 1989; 80:429–45.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Valk J, Prahl-Andersen B, van Ginkel FC. A comparison of jaw muscle cross-sections of long-face and normal adults. J Dent Res 1992; 71(6): 1279–85.
10 van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Valk J, Prahl-Andersen B, van Ginkel FC. Comparison of jaw-muscle bite-force cross-sections obtained by means of magnetic resonance imaging and high-resolution CT scanning. J Dent Res 1989; 68(12): 1765–70.
11 Goto TK, Yahagi M, Nakamura Y, Tokumori K, Langenbach GEJ, Yoshiura K. In vivo cross-sectional area of human jaw muscles varies with section location and jaw position. J Dent Res 2005; 84(6): 570–75.
12 Xu J, Yuasa K, Yoshiura K, Kanda S. Quantitative analysis of masticatory muscles using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994; 23:154–58.[Abstract]
13 Higashino R. Relationship between jaws and the masseter muscle by superimposing MR images on the cephalogram. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi 2006; 73(1): 116–24.[Medline]
14 Koolstra JH, van Eijden TMGJ, van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Valk J. Computer-assisted estimation of lines of action of human masticatory muscles reconstructed in vivo by means of magnetic resonance imaging of parallel sections. Arch Oral Biol 1990; 35:549–56.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 Hsu CW, Shiau YY, Chen CM, Chen KC, Liu HM. Measurement of the size and orientation of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles. Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B 2001; 25(1): 45–49.[Medline]
16 Sasaki K, Hannam AG, Wood WW. Relationships between the size, position, and angulation of human jaw muscles and unilateral first molar bite force. J Dent Res 1989; 68(3): 499–503.
17 Goto TK, Nishida S, Yahagi M, et al. Size and orientation of masticatory muscles in patients with mandibular laterognathism. J Dent Res 2006; 85(6): 552–56.
18 van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, van Ginkel FC, Prahl Andersen B. Jaw muscle orientation and moment arms of long-face and normal adults. J Dent Res 1996; 75(6): 1372–80.
19 Lo LJ, Chen YR. The volume of muscles of mastication in patients receiving mandibular contouring surgery: a comparative study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60(2): 125–29.[CrossRef][Medline]
20 Lamey PJ, Burnett CA, Fartash L, Clifford TJ, McGovern JM. Migraine and masticatiory muscle volume, bite force, and craniofacial morphology. Headache 2001; 41(1): 49–56.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 Goto TK, Tokumori K, Nakamura Y, et al. Volume changes in human masticatory muscles between jaw closing and opening. J Dent Res 2002; 81:428–32.
22 Lo LJ, Mardini S, Chen YR. Volumetric change in the muscles of mastication following resection of mandibular angles: a long-term follow up. Ann Plas Surg 2005; 54:615–21.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 Boom HPW, van Spronsen PH, van Ginkel FC, van Schijndel RA, Castelijns JA, Tuinzing DB. A comparison of human jaw muscle cross-sectional area and volume in long-and short-face subjects, using MRI. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53 (3): 273–81.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 Chan HJ, Woods M, Stella D. Mandibular muscle morphology in children with different vertical facial patterns: a 3-dimensional computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133(1): 10.e1–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
25 Newton JP, Abel EW, Robertson EM, Yemm R. Changes in human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles with age: a study by computed tomography. Gerodontics 1987; 3:151–54.[Medline]
26 Dicker G, van Spronsen PH, van Ginkel FC, et al. Adaptation of jaw closing muscles after surgical mandibular advancement procedures in different vertical craniofacial types: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103:475–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
27 Kitai N, Fuji Y, Murakami S, Furukawa S, Kreiborg S, Takada K. Human masticatory muscle volume and zygomatico-mandibular form in adults with mandibular prognathism. J Dent Res 2002; 81(11): 752–56.
28 Fukui K, Takdokoro T, Himuro T, Yamaguchi T, Ohno T. Postoperative evaluation of mandibular prognathism corrected by sagittal splitting osteotomy. Nippon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi 1989; 48(1): 48–58.[Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |